Research Article

# Two Sharp Inequalities for Power Mean, Geometric Mean, and Harmonic Mean

Yu-Ming Chu1* and Wei-Feng Xia2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China

2 School of Teacher Education, Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, China

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2009, 2009:741923 doi:10.1155/2009/741923

 Received: 23 July 2009 Accepted: 30 October 2009 Published: 22 November 2009

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

For , the power mean of order of two positive numbers and is defined by . In this paper, we establish two sharp inequalities as follows: and for all . Here and denote the geometric mean and harmonic mean of and respectively.

### 1. Introduction

For , the power mean of order of two positive numbers and is defined by

(11)

Recently, the power mean has been the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for can be found in literature  [112]. It is well known that is continuous and increasing with respect to for fixed and . If we denote by and the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and harmonic mean of and , respectively, then

(12)

In [13], Alzer and Janous established the following sharp double-inequality (see also   [14,page 350]):

(13)

for all

In [15], Mao proved

(14)

for all , and is the best possible lower power mean bound for the sum .

The purpose of this paper is to answer the questions: what are the greatest values and , and the least values and , such that and for all ?

### 2. Main Results

Theorem 2.1.

for all , equality holds if and only if , and is the best possible lower power mean bound for the sum .

Proof.

If , then we clearly see that .

If and , then simple computation leads to

(21)

Next, we prove that is the best possible lower power mean bound for the sum .

For any and , one has

(22)

where .

Let , then the Taylor expansion leads to

(23)

Equations (2.2) and (2.3) imply that for any there exists , such that for .

Remark 2.2.

For any , one has

(24)

Therefore, is the best possible upper power mean bound for the sum .

Theorem 2.3.

for all , equality holds if and only if , and is the best possible lower power mean bound for the sum .

Proof.

If , then we clearly see that

If and , then elementary calculation yields

(25)

Next, we prove that is the best possible lower power mean bound for the sum .

For any and , one has

(26)

where .

Let , then the Taylor expansion leads to

(27)

Equations (2.6) and (2.7) imply that for any there exists , such that

(28)

for .

Remark 2.4.

For any , one has

(29)

Therefore, is the best possible upper power mean bound for the sum .

### Acknowledgments

This research is partly supported by N S Foundation of China under Grant 60850005 and the N S Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grants Y7080185 and Y607128.

### References

1. Wu, SH: Generalization and sharpness of the power means inequality and their applications. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 312(2), 637–652 (2005). Publisher Full Text

2. Richards, KC: Sharp power mean bounds for the Gaussian hypergeometric function. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 308(1), 303–313 (2005). Publisher Full Text

3. Wang, WL, Wen, JJ, Shi, HN: Optimal inequalities involving power means. Acta Mathematica Sinica. 47(6), 1053–1062 (2004)

4. Hästö, PA: Optimal inequalities between Seiffert's mean and power means. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications. 7(1), 47–53 (2004). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

5. Alzer, H, Qiu, S-L: Inequalities for means in two variables. Archiv der Mathematik. 80(2), 201–215 (2003). Publisher Full Text

6. Alzer, H: A power mean inequality for the gamma function. Monatshefte für Mathematik. 131(3), 179–188 (2000). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text

7. Tarnavas, CD, Tarnavas, DD: An inequality for mixed power means. Mathematical Inequalities & Applications. 2(2), 175–181 (1999). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

8. Bukor, J, Tóth, J, Zsilinszky, L: The logarithmic mean and the power mean of positive numbers. Octogon Mathematical Magazine. 2(1), 19–24 (1994)

9. Pečarić, JE: Generalization of the power means and their inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 161(2), 395–404 (1991). Publisher Full Text

10. Chen, J, Hu, B: The identric mean and the power mean inequalities of Ky Fan type. Facta Universitatis.(4), 15–18 (1989)

11. Imoru, CO: The power mean and the logarithmic mean. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. 5(2), 337–343 (1982). Publisher Full Text

12. Lin, TP: The power mean and the logarithmic mean. The American Mathematical Monthly. 81, 879–883 (1974). Publisher Full Text

13. Alzer, H, Janous, W: Solution of problem 8*. Crux Mathematicorum. 13, 173–178 (1987)

14. Bullen, PS, Mitrinović, DS, Vasić, PM: Means and Their Inequalities, Mathematics and Its Applications (East European Series),p. xx+459. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1988)

15. Mao, QJ: Power mean, logarithmic mean and Heronian dual mean of two positive number. Journal of Suzhou College of Education. 16(1-2), 82–85 (1999)