Table 1 |
||||||||||
|
Numerical results: Algorithm 3.4 with |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0.001 |
|
|
0.272 |
|
|
|
0.395 |
|
|
2 |
|
0.133 |
|
|
|
0.080 |
0.493 |
|
|
0.307 |
|
3 |
|
0.320 |
|
|
0.463 |
|
|
0.255 |
|
|
|
4 |
0.197 |
0.161 |
0.434 |
|
0.505 |
|
0.451 |
|
|
0.278 |
|
5 |
0.291 |
0.071 |
|
|
0.453 |
|
|
|
0.238 |
0.166 |
|
6 |
|
0.246 |
0.211 |
|
0.044 |
|
0.466 |
|
0.486 |
|
|
7 |
|
0.220 |
0.134 |
0.321 |
|
0.364 |
|
0.551 |
0.421 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
0.365 |
|
|
0.387 |
0.217 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0.562 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.124 |
|
0.319 |
|
10 |
0.071 |
0.134 |
|
|
0.307 |
0.010 |
0.052 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Anh and Kim Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2010 2010:657192 doi:10.1155/2010/657192 |
||||||||||
.
