Open Access Research

Some sharp integral inequalities involving partial derivatives

Chang-Jian Zhao1*, Wing-Sum Cheung2 and Mihály Bencze3

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, P. R. China

2 Department of Mathematics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

3 Str. Hărmanului 6, 505600 Săcele-Négyfalu, Jud. Braşov, Romania

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:109 doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-109


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109


Received:1 February 2012
Accepted:18 May 2012
Published:18 May 2012

© 2012 Zhao et al; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The main purpose of the present article is to establish some new sharp integral inequalities in 2n independent variables. Our results in special cases yield some of the recent results on Pachpatter, Agarwal and Sheng's inequalities and provide some new estimates on such types of inequalities.

Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 26D15.

Keywords:
Cauchy-Schwarz's inequality; Pachpatte's inequality; Hölder integral inequality; the arithmetic-geometric means inequality

1 Introduction

Inequalities involving functions of n independent variables, their partial derivatives, integrals play a fundamental role in establishing the existence and uniqueness of initial and boundary value problems for ordinary and partial differential equations as well as difference equations [1-10]. Especially, in view of wider applications, inequalities due to Agarwal, Opial, Pachpatte, Wirtinger, Poincaréand et al. have been generalized and sharpened from the very day of their discover. As a matter of fact these now have become research topic in their own right [11-14]. In the present article we shall use the same method of Agarwal and Sheng [15], establish some new estimates on these types of inequalities involving 2n independent variables. We further generalize these inequalities which lead to result sharp than those currently available. An important characteristic of our results is that the constants in the inequalities are explicit.

2 Main results

Let R be the set of real numbers and ℝn the n-dimensional Euclidean space. Let E, E' be a bounded domain in Rn defined by <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M1','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M1">View MathML</a>. For xi, yi R, i = 1, ..., n, (x, y) = (x1, ..., xn, y1, ..., yn) is a variable point in E × E' and dxdy = dx1 ... dxn dy1 ... dyn. For any continuous real-valued function u(x, y) defined on E × E' we denote by ∫E E' u(x, y) dxdy the 2n-fold integral

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M2','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M2">View MathML</a>

and for any (x, y) ∈ E × E', ∫E(x) ∫E'(x)u(s, t) dsdt is the 2n-fold integral

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M3','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M3">View MathML</a>

We represent by F(E × E') the class of continuous functions u(x, y) : E × E' → ℝ, for each i,1 ≤ i n,

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M4','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M4">View MathML</a>

the class F(E × E') is denoted as G(E × E').

Theorem 2.1. Let l, μ, λ ≥ 1, be given real numbers such that <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M5','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M5">View MathML</a>. Further, let u(x, y) ∈ G(E × E'). Then, the following inequality holds

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>

(2.1)

where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ i n, in view of

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M8','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M8">View MathML</a>

we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M9','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M9">View MathML</a>

(2.2)

and

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M10','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M10">View MathML</a>

(2.3)

where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M11','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M11">View MathML</a>

Hence, from (2.2) and (2.3) and in view of the arithmetic-geometric means inequality and Hölder inequality with indices μ and λ, it follows that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M12','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M12">View MathML</a>

(2.4)

Now, summing the inequalities (2.4) for 1 ≤ i n, integrating over E × E' and applying Holder inequality with indices μ and λ two times, we get

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M13','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M13">View MathML</a>

where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M14','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M14">View MathML</a>

The proof is complete.

Remark 2.1. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.1) and with suitable modifications, then (2.1) becomes

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M15','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M15">View MathML</a>

where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M16','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M16">View MathML</a>

This is just a important inequality which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].

Remark 2.2. For the given real numbers lk ≥ 0, 1 ≤ k r, such that rlk ≥ 1, the arithmetic-geometric means inequality and (2.1) gives

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M17','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M17">View MathML</a>

(2.5)

This is just a general form of the following result which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M18','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M18">View MathML</a>

where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M19','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M19">View MathML</a>

Remark 2.3. In particular, for lk = (pk + 2)/(2r), pk ≥ 1,1 ≤ k r, μ = λ = 2, the inequality (2.5) reduces to

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M20','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M20">View MathML</a>

This is just a general form of the following result which was given by Agarwal and Sheng [15].

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M21','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M21">View MathML</a>

On the other hand, the above inequality with the right-hand side multiplied by <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M22','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M22">View MathML</a> and the term <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M23','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M23">View MathML</a> replace by <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M24','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M24">View MathML</a> has been proved by Pachpatte [16].

Remark 2.4. If u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.1), then the inequality (2.1) and its particular case l ≥ 2, μ = λ = 2 with the right-hand side multiplied by l have been separately proved by Pachpatte in [17].

Theorem 2.2. Let λ ≥ 1 and u(x, y) ∈ G(E × E'). Then, the following inequality holds

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M25','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M25">View MathML</a>

(2.6)

where β = max1≤in(bi - ai) and α = max1≤in(di - ci).

Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ i n, we obtain that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M26','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M26">View MathML</a>

and hence from the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, it follows that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M27','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M27">View MathML</a>

(2.7)

and similarly,

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M28','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M28">View MathML</a>

(2.8)

Hence, multiplying (2.7) and (2.8) and in view of using the arithmetic-geometric means inequality, summing the resulting inequalities for 1 ≤ i n, and then integrating over E × E', to obtain

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M29','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M29">View MathML</a>

where β = max1≤in(bi - ai) and α = max1≤in(di - ci).

Hence, using Hölder inequality with indices λ and λ/(λ - 1) in right-hand side of above inequality, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M30','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M30">View MathML</a>

The proof is complete.

Remark 2.5. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.6) and with suitable modifications, then (2.6) becomes the following Agarwal and Sheng [15] inequality.

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M31','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M31">View MathML</a>

where β = max1≤in(bi - ai).

Theorem 2.3. Let l ≥ 0, m ≥ 1 be given real numbers, and let u(x, y) ∈ G(E × E').

Then, the following inequality holds

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M32','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M32">View MathML</a>

(2.8a)

Proof. For each fixed i, 1 ≤ i n, we obtain that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M33','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M33">View MathML</a>

and, hence, it follows that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M34','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M34">View MathML</a>

(2.9)

and, similarly,

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M35','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M35">View MathML</a>

(2.10)

Now, adding (2.9) and (2.10) and integrating the resulting inequality from ai to bi and ci to di, respectively. Then

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M36','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M36">View MathML</a>

Next in each integral of the right-hand side of the above inequality we apply Hölder inequality with indices m and m/(m - 1), to get

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M37','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M37">View MathML</a>

which is unless <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M38','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M38">View MathML</a> (for which the inequality (2.8) is obvious), is the same as

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M39','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M39">View MathML</a>

Finally, raising m-th power both sides of the above inequality, integrating the resulting inequality from aj to bj and cj to dj, respectively, then summing the n inequalities 1 ≤ i n, we find the desired inequality (2.8).

Remark 2.6. Let u(x, y) reduce to u(x) in (2.8) and with suitable modifications, then (2.8) becomes the following Agarwal and Sheng [15] inequality.

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M40','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/109/mathml/M40">View MathML</a>

Remark 2.7. The inequality (2.8) for u(x, y) reduce to u(x), with the right-hand sides multiplied by mm and (bi - ai)m replaced by (αβ)m has been obtained by Pachpatte [18].

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

C-JZ, W-SC and MB jointly contributed to the main results Theorems 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

C.-J. Zhao research was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (10971205). W.-S. Cheung research was partially supported by a HKU URG grant.

References

  1. Agarwal, RP, Pang, PYH: Opial Inequalities with Applications in Differential and Difference Equations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)

  2. Agarwal, RP, Lakshmikantham, V: Uniqueness and Nonuniqueness Criteria for Ordinary Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore (1993)

  3. Agarwal, RP, Thandapani, E: On some new integrodifferential inequalities Anal sti Univ. "Al I Cuza" din Iasi. 28, 123–126 (1982)

  4. Bainov, D, Simeonov, P: Integral Inequalities and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

  5. Li, JD: Opial-type integral inequalities involving several higher order derivatives. J Math Anal Appl. 167, 98–100 (1992). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Mitrinovič, DS, Pečarić, JE, Fink, AM: Inequalities involving Functions and Their Integrals ang Derivatives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

  7. Cheung, WS: On Opial-type inequalities in two variables. Aequationes Math. 38, 236–244 (1989). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Cheung, WS: Some new Opial-type inequalities. Mathematika. 37, 136–142 (1990). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Cheung, WS: Some generalized Opial-type inequalities. J Math Anal Appl. 162, 317–321 (1991). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Cheung, WS: Opial-type inequalities with m functions in n variables. Mathematika. 39, 319–326 (1992). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Crooke, PS: On two inequalities of the Sobolev type. Appl Anal. 3, 345–358 (1974). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Pachpatte, BG: Opial type inequality in several variables. Tamkang J Math. 22, 7–11 (1991)

  13. Pachpatte, BG: On some new integral inequalities in two independent variables. J Math Anal Appl. 129, 375–382 (1988). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Wang, XJ: Sharp constant in a Sobolev inequality. Nonlinear Anal. 20, 261–268 (1993). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Agarwal, RP, Sheng, Q: Sharp integral inequalities in n independent varibles. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl. 26(2), 179–210 (1996). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Pachpatte, BG: On Sobolev type integral inequalities. Proc R Soc Edinb. 103, 1–14 (1986). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Pachpatte, BG: On two inequalities of the Serrin type. J Math Anal Appl. 116, 193–199 (1986). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Pachpatte, BG: On some variants of Sobolev's inequality. Soochow J Math. 17, 121–129 (1991)