Open Access Research

A new iterative scheme with nonexpansive mappings for equilibrium problems

Anh PN1* and Thanh DD2

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Scientific Fundamentals, Posts and Telecommunications Institute of Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

2 Department of Mathematics, Haiphong university, Vietnam

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 2012, 2012:116 doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-116


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116


Received:5 December 2011
Accepted:28 May 2012
Published:28 May 2012

© 2012 PN and DD; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest a new iteration scheme for finding a common of the solution set of monotone, Lipschitz-type continuous equilibrium problems and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping. The scheme is based on both hybrid method and extragradient-type method. We obtain a strong convergence theorem for the sequences generated by these processes in a real Hilbert space. Based on this result, we also get some new and interesting results. The results in this paper generalize, extend, and improve some well-known results in the literature.

AMS 2010 Mathematics subject classification: 65 K10, 65 K15, 90 C25, 90 C33.

Keywords:
Equilibrium problems; nonexpansive mappings; monotone; Lipschitz-type continuous; fixed point

1 Introduction

Let be a real Hilbert space with inner product 〈·,·〉 and norm || · ||. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . A mapping S : C C is a contraction with a constant δ ∈ (0, 1), if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M2','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M2">View MathML</a>

If δ = 1, then S is called nonexpansive on C. Fix(S) is denoted by the set of fixed points of S. Let <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93">View MathML</a> be a bifunction such that f(x, x) = 0 for all x C. We consider the equilibrium problem in the sense of Blum and Oettli (see [1]) which is presented as follows:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M3','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M3">View MathML</a>

The set of solutions of EP(f, C) is denoted by Sol(f, C). The bifunction f is called strongly monotone on C with ß > 0, if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M4','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M4">View MathML</a>

monotone on C, if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M5','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M5">View MathML</a>

pseudomonotone on C, if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>

Lipschitz-type continuous on C with constants c1 > 0 and c2 > 0 (see [2]), if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

It is well-known that Problem EP(f, C) includes, as particular cases, the optimization problem, the variational inequality problem, the Nash equilibrium problem in noncooperative games, the fixed point problem, the nonlinear complementarity problem and the vector minimization problem (see [2-6]).

In recent years, the problem to find a common point of the solution set of problem (EP) and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping becomes an attractive field for many researchers (see [7-15]). An important special case of equilibrium problems is the variational inequalities (shortly (VIP)), where F : C and f(x, y) = 〈F(x), y - x〉. Various methods have been developed for finding a common point of the solution set of problem (VIP) and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping when F is monotone (see [16-18]).

Motivated by fixed point techniques of Takahashi and Takahashi in [19] and an improvement set of extragradient-type iteration methods in [20], we introduce a new iteration algorithm for finding a common of the solution set of equilibrium problems with a monotone and Lipschitz-type continuous bifunction and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping. We show that all of the iterative sequences generated by this algorithm convergence strongly to the common element in a real Hilbert space.

2 Preliminaries

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space . We write xn x to indicate that the sequence {xn} converges weakly to x as n → ∞, xn → x implies that {xn} converges strongly to x. For any x , there exists a nearest point in C, denoted by PrC(x), such that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M8','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M8">View MathML</a>

PrC is called the metric projection of to C. It is well known that PrC satisfies the following properties:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M9','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M9">View MathML</a>

(2.1)

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M10','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M10">View MathML</a>

(2.2)

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M11','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M11">View MathML</a>

(2.3)

Let us assume that a bifunction <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93">View MathML</a> and a nonexpansive mapping S : C C satisfy the following conditions:

A1. f is Lipschitz-type continuous on C;

A2. f is monotone on C;

A3 . for each x C, f (x, ·) is subdifferentiable and convex on C;

A4. Fix(S) ∩ Sol(f, C) ≠ ∅.

Recently, Takahashi and Takahashi in [19] first introduced an iterative scheme by the viscosity approximation method. The sequence {xk} is defined by:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M12','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M12">View MathML</a>

where C is a nonempty closed convex subset of and g is a contractive mapping of into itself. The authors showed that under certain conditions over {αk} and {rk}, sequences {xk} and {uk} converge strongly to z = PrSol(f,C)∩Fix(S) (g(x0)). Recently, iterative methods for finding a common element of the set of solutions of equilibrium problems and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping have further developed by many authors. These methods require to solve approximation auxilary equilibrium problems.

In this paper, we introduce a new iteration method for finding a common point of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping S and the set of solutions of problem EP(f, C). At each our iteration, the main steps are to solve two strongly convex problems

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M13','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M13">View MathML</a>

(2.4)

and compute the next iteration point by Mann-type fixed points

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M14','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M14">View MathML</a>

(2.5)

where g : C C is a δ-contraction with <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M15','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M15">View MathML</a>.

To investigate the convergence of this scheme, we recall the following technical lemmas which will be used in the sequel.

Lemma 2.1 (see [21]) Let {an} be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M16','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M16">View MathML</a>

where {αn}, and {ßn} satisfy the conditions:

(i) αn ⊂ (0, 1) and <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M17','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M17">View MathML</a>;

(ii) <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M18','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M18">View MathML</a>

Then

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M19','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M19">View MathML</a>

Lemma 2.2 ([22]) Assume that S is a nonexpansive self-mapping of a nonempty closed convex subset C of a real Hilbert space . If Fix(S) ≠ Ø, then I - S is demiclosed; that is, whenever {xk} is a sequence in C weakly converging to some <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M20','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M20">View MathML</a> and the sequence {(I - S)(xk)} strongly converges to some <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M21','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M21">View MathML</a>, it follows that <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M22','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M22">View MathML</a>. Here I is the identity operator of .

Lemma 2.3 (see [20], Lemma 3.1) Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space . Let <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93">View MathML</a>be a pseudomonotone, Lipschitz-type continuous bifunction with constants c1 > 0 and c2 > 0. For each × C, let f(x, ·) be convex and subdifferentiable on C. Suppose that the sequences {xk}, {yk}, {tk} generated by Scheme (2.4) and x* Sol(f, C). Then

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M23','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M23">View MathML</a>

3 Main results

Now, we prove the main convergence theorem.

Theorem 3.1 Suppose that Assumptions A1-A4 are satisfied, x0 C and two positive sequences {λk}, {ak} satisfy the following restrictions:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M24','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M24">View MathML</a>

Then the sequences {xk}, {yk} and {tk} generated by (2.4) and (2.5) converge strongly to the same point x*, where

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M25','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M25">View MathML</a>

The proof of this theorem is divided into several steps.

Step 1. Claim that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M26','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M26">View MathML</a>

Proof of Step 1. For each x* Fix(S) ∩ Sol(f, C), it follows from xk+1 = akg(xk) + (1 - ak)S(tk), Lemma 2.3 and <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M27','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M27">View MathML</a> that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M28','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M28">View MathML</a>

Then, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M29','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M29">View MathML</a>

and

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M30','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M30">View MathML</a>

(3.1)

By the similar way, also

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M31','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M31">View MathML</a>

Combining this, (3.1) and the inequality ||xk - tk|| = ||xk - yk || + || yk - tk ||, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M32','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M32">View MathML</a>

(3.2)

Step 2. Claim that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M33','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M33">View MathML</a>

Proof of Step 2. It is easy to see that <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M34','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M34">View MathML</a> if and only if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M35','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M35">View MathML</a>

where NC(x) is the (outward) normal cone of C at x C. This means that <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M36','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M36">View MathML</a>, where w ∈ ∂2f(yk, tk) and <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M37','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M37">View MathML</a>. By the definition of the normal cone NC we have, from this relation that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M38','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M38">View MathML</a>

Substituting t = tk+1 into this inequality, we get

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M39','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M39">View MathML</a>

(3.3)

Since f(x, ·) is convex on C for all x C, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M40','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M40">View MathML</a>

Using this and (3.3), we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M41','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M41">View MathML</a>

(3.4)

By the similar way, we also have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M42','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M42">View MathML</a>

(3.5)

Using (3.4), (3.5) and f is Lipschitz-type continuous and monotone, we get

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M43','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M43">View MathML</a>

Hence

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M44','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M44">View MathML</a>

(3.6)

Since (3.6), ak+1 - ak 0 as k →∞, g is contractive on C, Lemma 2.3, Step 2 and the definition of xk+1 that xk+1 = akg(xk) + akS(tk), we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M45','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M45">View MathML</a>

where δ is contractive constant of the mapping g, M = sup{||g(xk - 1) - S(tk - 1)||: k = 0, 1, ...} and <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M46','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M46">View MathML</a>, since <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M47','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M47">View MathML</a> and <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M48','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M48">View MathML</a>, in view of Lemma 2.1, we have <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M49','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M49">View MathML</a>.

Step 3. Claim that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M50','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M50">View MathML</a>

Proof of Step 3. From xk+1 = akg(xk) + (1 - ak)S(tk), we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M51','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M51">View MathML</a>

and hence

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M52','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M52">View MathML</a>

Using this, <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M53','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M53">View MathML</a>, Step 1 and Step 2, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M54','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M54">View MathML</a>

Step 4. Claim that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M55','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M55">View MathML</a>

Proof of Step 4. By Step 1, {tk} is bounded, there exists a subsequence <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56">View MathML</a> of {tk} such that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M57','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M57">View MathML</a>

Since the sequence <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56">View MathML</a> is bounded, there exists a subsequence <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M58','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M58">View MathML</a> of <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56">View MathML</a> which converges weakly to <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M59','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M59">View MathML</a>. Without loss of generality we suppose that the sequence <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M56">View MathML</a> converges weakly to <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M59','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M59">View MathML</a> such that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M60','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M60">View MathML</a>

(3.7)

Since Lemma 2.2 and Step 3, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M61','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M61">View MathML</a>

(3.8)

Now we show that <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M62','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M62">View MathML</a>. By Step 1, we also have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M63','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M63">View MathML</a>

Since yk is the unique solution of the strongly convex problem

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M64','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M64">View MathML</a>

we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M65','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M65">View MathML</a>

This follows that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M66','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M66">View MathML</a>

where w 2f (xk, yk) and wk NC(yk). By the definition of the normal cone NC, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M67','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M67">View MathML</a>

(3.9)

On the other hand, since f(xk, ·) is subdifferentiable on C, by the well-known Moreau-Rockafellar theorem, there exists w 2f(xk, yk) such that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M68','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M68">View MathML</a>

Combining this with (3.9), we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M69','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M69">View MathML</a>

Hence

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M70','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M70">View MathML</a>

Then, using <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M71','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M71">View MathML</a> and the continuity of f , we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M72','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M72">View MathML</a>

Combining this and (3.8), we obtain

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M73','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M73">View MathML</a>

By (3.7) and the definition of x*, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M74','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M74">View MathML</a>

Using this and Step 3, we get

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M75','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M75">View MathML</a>

Step 5. Claim that the sequences {xk}, {yk} and {tk} converge strongly to x*.

Proof of Step 5. Using xk+1 = αkg(xk) + (1 - ak)S(tk) and Lemma 2.3, we have

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M76','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M76">View MathML</a>

where Ak and Bk are defined by

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M77','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M77">View MathML</a>

Since <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M78','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M78">View MathML</a>, Step 4, we have <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M79','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M79">View MathML</a> and hence

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M80','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M80">View MathML</a>

By Lemma 2.1, we obtain that the sequence {xk} converges strongly to x*. It follows from Step 1 that the sequences {yk} and {tk} also converge strongly to the same solution x*= PrFix(S)∩Sol(f,C)g(x*).

   □

4 Applications

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space and F be a function from C into . In this section, we consider the variational inequality problem which is presented as follows:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M81','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M81">View MathML</a>

Let <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M93">View MathML</a> be defined by f(x, y) = 〈F(x), y - x〉. Then Problem EP(f, C) can be written in VI(F, C). The set of solutions of VI(F, C) is denoted by Sol(F, C). Recall that the function F is called strongly monotone on C with ß > 0 if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M82','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M82">View MathML</a>

monotone on C if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M83','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M83">View MathML</a>

pseudomonotone on C if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M84','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M84">View MathML</a>

Lipschitz continuous on C with constants L > 0 if

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M85','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M85">View MathML</a>

Since

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M86','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M86">View MathML</a>

(2.4), (2.5) and Theorem 3.1, we obtain that the following convergence theorem for finding a common element of the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping S and the solution set of problem VI(F, C).

Theorem 4.1 Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space , F be a function from C to such that F is monotone and L-Lipschitz continuous on C, g : C C is contractive with constant <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M87','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M87">View MathML</a> S: C C be nonexpansive and positive sequences {ak} and {λk} satisfy the following restrictions

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M88','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M88">View MathML</a>

Then sequences {xk}, {yk} and {tk} generated by

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M89','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M89">View MathML</a>

converge strongly to the same point x* PrFix(S)∩Sol(F,C)g(x*).

Thus, this scheme and its convergence become results proposed by Nadezhkina and Takahashi in [23]. As direct consequences of Theorem 3.1, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 4.2 Suppose that Assumptions A1-A3 are satisfied, Sol(f, C) ≠ Ø, x0 C and two positive sequences {λk}, {ak} satisfy the following restrictions:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M90','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M90">View MathML</a>

Then, the sequences {xk}, {yk} and {tk} generated by

<a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M91','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M91">View MathML</a>

where g : C C is a δ-contraction with <a onClick="popup('http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M92','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2012/1/116/mathml/M92">View MathML</a>, converge strongly to the same point x*=PrSol(f,C)g(x*).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The main idea of this paper is proposed by P.N. Anh. The revision is made by DDT. PNA and DDT prepared the manuscript initially and performed all the steps of proof in this research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their really helpful and constructive comments that helped us very much in improving the paper.

The work was supported by National Foundation for Science and Technology Development of Vietnam (NAFOSTED).

References

  1. Blum, E, Oettli, W: From optimization and variational inequality to equilibrium problems. The Math Stud. 63, 127–149 (1994)

  2. Mastroeni, G: On auxiliary principle for equilibrium problems. In: Daniele P, Giannessi F, Maugeri A (eds.) Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2003)

  3. Anh, PN: A logarithmic quadratic regularization method for solving pseudomonotone equilibrium problems. Acta Math Vietnamica. 34, 183–200 (2009)

  4. Anh, PN: An LQP regularization method for equilibrium problems on polyhedral. Vietnam J Math. 36, 209–228 (2008)

  5. Anh, PN, Kim, JK: Outer approximation algorithms for pseudomonotone equilibrium problems. Comp Math Appl. 61, 2588–2595 (2011). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Quoc, TD, Anh, PN, Muu, LD: Dual extragradient algorithms to equilibrium Problems. J Glob Optim. 52, 139–159 (2012). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Anh, PN: Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and Ky Fan inequalities. J Optim Theory Appl DOI 10.1007/s10957-012-0005-x (2012)

  8. Anh, PN, Kim, JK, Nam, JM: Strong convergence of an extragradient method for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. J Korean Math Soc. 49, 187–200 (2012). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Anh, PN, Son, DX: A new iterative scheme for pseudomonotone equilibrium problems and a finite family of pseudocontractions. J Appl Math Inform. 29, 1179–1191 (2011)

  10. Ceng, LC, Schaible, S, Yao, JC: Implicit iteration scheme with perturbed mapping for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of finitely many nonexpansive mappings. J Optim Theory Appl. 139, 403–418 (2008). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Chen, R, Shen, X, Cui, S: Weak and strong convergence theorems for equilibrium problems and countable strict pseudocontractions mappings in Hilbert space. J Ineq Appl DOI:10.1155/2010/474813 (2010)

  12. Wang, S, Cho, YJ, Qin, X: A new iterative method for solving equilibrium problems and fixed point problems for an infinite family of nonexpansive mappings. Fix Point Theory Appl DOI: 10.1155/2010/165098 (2010)

  13. Wangkeeree, R: An extragradient approximation method for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of a countable family of nonexpansive mappings. Fix Point Theory Appl DOI:10.1155/2008/134148 (2008)

  14. Yao, Y, Liou, YC, Jao, JC: Convergence theorem for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinite family of nonexpansive mappings. Fix Point Theory Appl DOI:10.1155/2007/64363 (2007)

  15. Yao, Y, Liou, YC, Wu, YJ: An extragradient method for mixed equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. Fix Point Theory Appl DOI: 10.1155/2009/632819 (2009)

  16. Ceng, LC, Petrusel, A, Lee, C, Wong, MM: Two extragradient approximation methods for variational inequalities and fixed point problems of strict pseudo-contractions. Taiwanese J Math. 13, 607–632 (2009)

  17. Takahashi, S, Toyoda, M: Weakly convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. J Optim Theory Appl. 118, 417–428 (2003). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Zeng, LC, Yao, JC: Strong convergence theorem by an extragradient method for fixed point problems and variational inequality problems. Taiwanese J Math. 10, 1293–1303 (2010)

  19. Takahashi, S, Takahashi, W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. J Math Anal Appl. 331, 506–515 (2007). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Anh, PN: A hybrid extragradient method extended to fixed point problems and equilibrium problems. Optimization DOI:10.1080/02331934.2011.607497 (2012)

  21. Xu, HK: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings. J Math Anal Appl. 298, 279–291 (2004). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Goebel, K, Kirk, WA: Topics on metric fixed point theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (1990)

  23. Nadezhkina, N, Takahashi, W: Weak convergence theorem by an extragradient method for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. J Optim Theory Appl. 128, 191–201 (2006). Publisher Full Text OpenURL