Abstract
In this paper, we present two fixed point theorems on mappings, defined on GP-complete GP-metric spaces, which satisfy a generalized contraction property determined by certain upper semi-continuous functions. Furthermore, we illustrate applications of our theorems with a number of examples. Inspired by the work of Jachymski, we also establish equivalences of certain auxiliary maps in the context of GP-complete GP-metric spaces.
MSC: 47H10, 54H25.
Keywords:
fixed point; partial metric space; GP-metric space1 Introduction and preliminaries
In 1922, Stefan Banach [1] stated his celebrated theorem on the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point of
certain self-maps defined on certain metric spaces for the first time. Specifically,
this elegant theorem, also known as the Banach contraction mapping principle, can
be formulated as follows: any mapping
has a unique point
such that
provided that there exists a constant
satisfying the inequality
for every
, where
is a complete metric space. A mapping T for which the inequality mentioned above holds is called a contraction.
Since its first appearance, the Banach contraction mapping principle has become the main tool to study contractions as they appear abundantly in a wide array of quantitative sciences. Its most well-known application is in ordinary differential equations, particularly, in the proof of the Picard-Lindelöf theorem which guarantees the existence and uniqueness of solutions of first-order initial value problems. It is worth emphasizing that the remarkable strength of the Banach principle originates from the constructive process it provides to identify the fixed point. This notable strength further attracted the attention of not only many prominent mathematicians studying in many branches of mathematics related to nonlinear analysis, but also many researchers who are interested in iterative methods to examine the quantitative problems involving certain mappings and space structures required in their work in various areas such as social sciences, biology, economics, and computer sciences.
Indeed, in 1994, Matthews, a computer scientist who is an expert on semantics, announced in [2] an analog of Banach’s principle in a new space he called a partial metric space. Matthews’s innovative approach was quickly adopted and improved by fixed point theorists (see, e.g., [3-27]) with the aim of discovering analogs of Banach’s principle in the context of partial metric spaces to broaden its applications and enrich the fixed point theory as a result.
A closer look to the work of these distinguished mathematicians after Matthews’s studies reveals that their discoveries can be categorized in terms of the techniques implemented to produce the analogs of Banach’s principle. The first technique is to introduce new space structures with certain properties which guarantee the existence and/or uniqueness of fixed points of contractions. In addition to Matthews’s investigations, cone metric spaces, D-metric spaces, and G-metric spaces (see, e.g., [28-44]) constitute a few of the examples to the first approach. The second technique is to introduce mappings defined on metric spaces satisfying certain new contractive conditions. For example, cyclic contractions and weak ϕ contractions can be listed as a few.
As another example to the first approach mentioned above, Zand and Nezhad [43] recently introduced GP-metric spaces which are a combination of the notions of partial metric spaces and G-metric spaces. Then they proved a number of fixed point theorems on these new spaces for certain type of contractions. In this paper, we exercise the second approach by using the space structure they initiated to prove certain fixed point theorems for generalized contractions. First, we review the necessary notation, definitions, and fundamental results produced on GP-metric spaces that we will need in this work.
Definition 1.1[43]
Let X be a non-empty set. A function
is called a GP-metric if the following conditions are satisfied:
(GP3)
, symmetry in all three variables;
Then the pair
is called a GP-metric space.
Example 1.1[43]
Let
and define
for all
. Then
is a GP-metric space.
Proposition 1.1[43]
Let
be aGP-metric space, then for anyx, y, zand
, it follows that
Proposition 1.2[43]
EveryGP-metric space
defines a metric space
where
Definition 1.2[43]
Let
be a GP-metric space and let
be a sequence of points of X. A point
is said to be the limit of the sequence
or
if
Proposition 1.3[43]
Let
be aGP-metric space. Then, for any sequence
inXand a point
, the following are equivalent:
Definition 1.3[43]
(S1) A sequence
is called a GP-Cauchy if and only if
exists (and is finite);
(S2) A GP-partial metric space
is said to be GP-complete if and only if every GP-Cauchy sequence in X is GP-convergent to
such that
.
Now, we introduce the following.
Definition 1.4 Let
be a GP-metric space.
(M1) A sequence
is called 0-GP-Cauchy if and only if
;
(M2) A GP-metric space
is said to be 0-GP-complete if and only if every 0-GP-Cauchy sequence in XGP-converges to a point
such that
.
Example 1.2 Let
and define
for all
. Then
is a GP-complete GP-metric space. Moreover, if
(where ℚ denotes a set of rational numbers), then
is a 0-GP-complete GP-metric space.
Lemma 1.1 (See [45])
In the rest of this paper, we will denote the positive natural numbers by
and the natural numbers by ℕ.
2 Main results
In this section, we present our findings on fixed point theorems on 0-GP-complete GP-metric spaces. We first start with the following definition.
Definition 2.1 Let
be a GP-metric space and
be a map. Let
denote the value
Lemma 2.1If
is aGP-metric space and
is a map, then, for each
, we have
(3)The proof is complete. □
Lemma 2.2Let
be aGP-metric space and let
be a map such that
for all
, where
is a function such that
for all
. If
satisfies
for all
, then the following hold:
Proof
(a) From Lemma 2.1, we have
Since
for all
, then by Lemma 1.1(B), we get
for all
. Consequently,
. Now by condition (4), we deduce that
Clearly, (b) follows from (4), (a), and the fact that
for all
. □
Definition 2.2 A function
is called upper semi-continuous from the right if for each
and each sequence
such that
and
, the equality holds
.
Theorem 2.1Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and let
be a map such that
for all
, where
is an upper semi-continuous function from the right such that
for all
. ThenThas a unique fixed point
. Moreover,
.
Proof Let
. If there is
such that
, then
is a fixed point of T and the uniqueness of
follows as in the last part of the proof below. Hence, we assume that
for all
. Put
and construct the sequence
, where
for all
. Thus,
and
for all
. Define the sequence
by
for all
. From Lemma 2.2(b) we know that
is a non-increasing sequence. Hence, there exists
such that
as
. We will show that c must be equal to 0. Let
. By taking limitsup as
in condition (b) of Lemma 2.2, we get that
and so, by upper semi-continuity from the right of the function ϕ, we deduce
which is a contradiction. Hence,
. Consequently,
. Next we show that
. Assume the contrary. Then there exist
and sequences
,
in
with
and such that
for all
. From the fact that
, we can suppose, without loss of generality, that
. For each
, we have
and hence
. Now, let
be such that
and
for all
. Then
for all
. So,
. Since
for all
and ϕ is upper semi-continuous from the right, we deduce that
. On the other hand, for each
, we have
so
, a contradiction because
. Consequently,
and thus
is a Cauchy sequence in the GP-complete GP-metric space
. Hence, there is
such that
We show that z is a fixed point of T. To this end, we first note that
, so
. On the other hand, since for each
,
, it follows that
Therefore,
and thus
. Finally, let
be such that
. Then
Hence,
, i.e.,
. This concludes the proof. □
Definition 2.3 Let
be a given function. Then
will denote the value
(15)Then we obtain the following statement.
Corollary 2.1Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and let
be a map such that
for all
, where
is an upper semi-continuous from the right function such that
for all
. ThenThas a unique fixed point
. Moreover,
.
Proof Clearly, by taking
in the hypothesis, we have
for all
. Then the conditions of Theorem 2.1 hold. This concludes the proof. □
Example 2.1 Let
,
be defined by
. Then
is a GP-complete GP-metric space. Let
be defined by
and
for all
.
Proof Without loss of generality, we assume that
. Then
Then the condition of Theorem 2.1 holds and T has a unique fixed point 0 in
. Moreover,
. □
Example 2.2 Let
,
be defined by
. Then
is a GP-complete GP-metric space. Let
be defined by
Proof To prove this example, we need to consider the following cases:
Then the condition of Theorem 2.1 holds and T has a unique fixed point 0 in
. Moreover,
. □
Lemma 2.3Let
be nondecreasing and let
. If
, then
.
Theorem 2.2Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and
be a map such that
where
for all
, and
is a nondecreasing function such that
for all
. ThenThas a unique fixed point
. Moreover,
.
Proof Let
. If there is
such that
, then
is a fixed point of T and the uniqueness of
follows as in the last part of the proof below. Hence, we will assume that
for all
. Put
and construct the sequence
, where
for all
. Thus,
and
for all
. By Lemma 2.2(b),
for all
. Then, since ϕ is nondecreasing, we deduce that
for all
. Hence,
. Now, choose an arbitrary
. Since
, it follows from Lemma 2.3 that
, so there is
such that
and following this process,
and thus
is a Cauchy sequence in the
-complete
-metric space
. Hence, there is
such that
We show that z is a fixed point of T. Assume the contrary. Then
. For each
, we have
From our assumption that
, it easily follows that there is
such that
for all
. So,
for all
. Taking limits as
, we obtain that
a contradiction. Consequently,
. Finally, the uniqueness of z follows as in Theorem 2.1. □
Example 2.3 Let
,
be defined by
. Then
is a GP-complete GP-metric space. Let
be defined by
Proof Without loss of generality, we assume that
. Then
And so
Then the condition of Theorem 2.2 holds and T has a unique fixed point 0 in
. Moreover,
. □
Example 2.4 Let
,
be defined by
. Then
is a GP-complete GP-metric space. Let
be defined by
Proof To prove this example, we need to examine the following cases:
Then the condition of Theorem 2.2 holds and T has a unique fixed point 0 in
. Moreover,
. □
Corollary 2.2Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and
be a map such that
where
for all
, and
is a nondecreasing function such that
for all
. ThenThas a unique fixed point
. Moreover,
.
Similarly, we have the corollary below.
Corollary 2.3Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and
be a map such that
where
for all
, and
is a nondecreasing function such that
for all
. ThenThas a unique fixed point
. Moreover,
.
In [46], Jachymski proved the equivalence of auxiliary functions (see Lemma 1). Inspired by the results from this remarkable paper of Jachymski, we finish this paper by stating the following theorem.
Theorem 2.3 (See [46])
Let
be aGP-completeGP-metric space and
be a self-mapping. Assume that
Then the following statements are equivalent:
(i) there exist functions
such that
(ii) there exists a function
such that for any bounded sequence
of positive reals,
implies
and
(iii) there exists a continuous function
such that
and
(iv) there exist a function
and a nondecreasing, right-continuous function
with
and for all
with
(v) there exists a continuous and nondecreasing function
such that
and for all
with
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
-
Banach, S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales. Fundam. Math.. 3, 133–181 (1922)
-
Matthews, SG: Partial metric topology. Proc. 8th Summer Conference on General Topology and Applications. 183–197 (1994)
-
Ćirić, LJ, Samet, B, Aydi, H, Vetro, C: Common fixed points of generalized contractions on partial metric spaces and an application. Appl. Math. Comput.. 218, 2398–2406 (2011). Publisher Full Text
-
Di Bari, C, Milojević, M, Radenović, S, Vetro, P: Common fixed points for self-mappings on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2012, Article ID 140 (2012)
-
Ilić, D, Pavlović, V, Rakocević, V: Some new extensions of Banach’s contraction principle to partial metric space. Appl. Math. Lett.. 24, 1326–1330 (2011). Publisher Full Text
-
Karapinar, E, Erhan, IM: Fixed point theorems for operators on partial metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett.. 24, 1900–1904 (2011). Publisher Full Text
-
Karapinar, E: Generalizations of Caristi Kirk’s theorem on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2011, Article ID 4 (2011)
-
Karapinar, E: A note on common fixed point theorems in partial metric spaces. Miskolc Math. Notes. 12, 185–191 (2011)
-
Karapinar, E: Some fixed point theorems on the class of comparable partial metric spaces on comparable partial metric spaces. Appl. Gen. Topol.. 12, 187–192 (2011)
-
Karapinar, E: Ćirić types nonunique fixed point theorems on partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.. 5, 74–83 (2012)
-
Karapinar, E: Weak ϕ-contraction on partial metric spaces. J. Comput. Anal. Appl.. 14, 206–210 (2012)
-
Karapinar, E, Shobkolaei, N, Sedghi, S, Vaezpour, SM: A common fixed point theorem for cyclic operators on partial metric spaces. Filomat. 26, 407–414 (2012). Publisher Full Text
-
Karapinar, E, Erhan, I, Ulus, AY: Fixed point theorem for cyclic maps on partial metric spaces. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci.. 6(1), 239–244 (2012)
-
Nashine, HK, Kadelburg, Z, Radenović, S: Common fixed point theorems for weakly isotone increasing mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.019 (2011)
-
Kopperman, R, Matthews, SG, Pajoohesh, H: What do partial metrics represent. Spatial Representation: Discrete vs. Continuous Computational Models, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Wadern (2005)
-
Oltra, S, Valero, O: Banach’s fixed point theorem for partial metric spaces. Rend. Ist. Mat. Univ. Trieste. 36, 17–26 (2004)
-
O’Neill, SJ: Two topologies are better than one. Technical report, University of Warwick, Coventry (1995)
-
Romaguera, S: Fixed point theorems for generalized contractions on partial metric spaces. Topol. Appl.. 159, 194–199 (2012). Publisher Full Text
-
Romaguera, S: Matkowski’s type theorems for generalized contractions on (ordered) partial metric spaces. Appl. Gen. Topol.. 12, 213–220 (2011)
-
Romaguera, S, Schellekens, M: Partial metric monoids and semivaluation spaces. Topol. Appl.. 153, 948–962 (2005). Publisher Full Text
-
Romaguera, S, Valero, O: A quantitative computational model for complete partial metric spaces via formal balls. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci.. 19, 541–563 (2009). Publisher Full Text
-
Schellekens, MP: A characterization of partial metrizability: domains are quantifiable. Theor. Comput. Sci.. 305, 409–432 (2003). Publisher Full Text
-
Abedelljawad, T, Karapınar, E, Taş, K: Existence and uniqueness of common fixed point on partial metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett.. 24, 1894–1899 (2011). Publisher Full Text
-
Altun, I, Sola, F, Simsek, H: Generalized contractions on partial metric spaces. Topol. Appl.. 157, 2778–2785 (2010). Publisher Full Text
-
Altun, I, Erduran, A: Fixed point theorems for monotone mappings on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2011, Article ID 508730 (2011)
-
Aydi, H: Some coupled fixed point results on partial metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.. 2011, Article ID 647091 (2011)
-
Aydi, H: Some fixed point results in ordered partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl.. 4(2), 1–15 (2011)
-
Mustafa, Z, Sims, B: A new approach to generalized metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.. 7(2), 289–297 (2006)
-
Mustafa, Z, Sims, B: Some remarks concerning D-metric spaces. Valencia, Spain, July 2003. (2003)
-
Mustafa, Z: A new structure for generalized metric spaces with applications to fixed point theory. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia (2005)
-
Mustafa, Z, Obiedat, H, Awawdeh, F: Some fixed point theorem for mappings on complete G-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2008, Article ID 189870 (2008)
-
Mustafa, Z, Shatanawi, W, Bataineh, F: Existence of fixed point results in G-metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci.. 2009, Article ID 283028 (2009)
-
Mustafa, Z, Obiedat, H: A fixed point theorem of Reich in G-metric spaces. CUBO. 12(1), 83–93 (2010). Publisher Full Text
-
Mustafa, Z, Sims, B: Fixed point theorems for contractive mappings in complete G-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2009, Article ID 917175. doi:10.1155/2009/917175 (2009)
-
Mustafa, Z, Khandagjy, M, Shatanawi, W: Fixed point results on complete G-metric spaces. Studia Sci. Math. Hung.. 48(3), 304–319 (2011)
-
Mustafa, Z, Awawdeh, F, Shatanawi, W: Fixed point theorem for expansive mappings in G-metric spaces. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci.. 5(49-52), 2463–2472 (2010). PubMed Abstract
-
Mustafa, Z, Aydi, H, Karapınar, E: On common fixed points in G-metric spaces using (E.A) property. Comput. Math. Appl. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.051 (2012)
-
Mustafa, Z, Aydi, H, Karapınar, E: Mixed g-monotone property and quadruple fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2012, Article ID 71 (2012)
-
Saadati, R, Vaezpour, SM, Vetro, P, Rhoades, BE: Fixed point theorems in generalized partially ordered G-metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model.. 52, 797–801 (2010). Publisher Full Text
-
Shatanawi, W: Fixed point theory for contractive mappings satisfying Φ-maps in G-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2010, Article ID 181650 (2010)
-
Shatanawi, W: Some fixed point theorems in ordered G-metric spaces and applications. Abstr. Appl. Anal.. 2011, Article ID 126205 (2011)
-
Valero, O: On Banach fixed point theorems for partial metric spaces. Appl. Gen. Topol.. 6(2), 229–240 (2005)
-
Zand, MRA, Nezhad, AD: A generalization of partial metric spaces. J. Contemp. Appl. Math.. 24, 86–93 (2011)
-
Abbas, M, Khan, AR, Nazir, T: Coupled common fixed point results in two generalized metric spaces. Appl. Math. Comput.. 217, 6328–6336 (2011). Publisher Full Text
-
Aydi, H, Karapinar, E, Salimi, P: Some fixed point results in GP-metric spaces. J. Appl. Math.. 2012, Article ID 891713 (2012)
-
Jachymski, J: Equivalent conditions for generalized contractions on (ordered) metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal.. 74, 768–774 (2011). Publisher Full Text































































































