- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Imbedding inequalities with -norms for composite operators
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 544 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, we prove imbedding inequalities with -norms for the composition of the potential operator and homotopy operator applied to differential forms. We also establish the global imbedding inequality in -averaging domains.
MSC:35J60, 35B45, 30C65, 47J05, 46E35.
1 Introduction
The theory about operators applied to functions has been very well developed. However, the study about operators applied to differential forms has just begun. The purpose of this paper is to establish the local and global imbedding inequalities with -norms for the composition of the homotopy operator T and the potential operator P applied to differential forms. Specifically, we estimate the upper bound of the Orlicz-Sobolev-norm in terms of the -norm , where is a constant, B is a ball, and u is a differential form satisfying the A-harmonic equation. We also establish the global imbedding theorems in the -averaging domains and bounded domains, respectively. Differential forms and operators T and P are widely used not only in analysis and partial differential equations [1–7], but also in physics and potential analysis [8–11]. We all know that any differential form u can be decomposed as , where d is the differential operator, and T is the homotopy operator. In many situations, we need to estimate the composition of the homotopy operator T and the potential operator P. For example, when we consider the decomposition of , we have to study the composition of the homotopy operator T and the potential operator P. Our main results are presented and proved in Theorem 2.6, Theorem 3.3 and Theorem 3.6, respectively.
We assume that Ω is a bounded domain in , , B and σB are the balls with the same center and throughout this paper. We do not distinguish the balls from cubes in this paper. We use to denote the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure of a set . For a function u, the average of u over B is defined by . All integrals involved in this paper are the Lebesgue integrals. Differential forms are extensions of differentiable functions in . For example, the function is called a 0-form. A differential 1-form in can be written as , where the coefficient functions , , are differentiable. Similarly, a differential k-form can be expressed as
where , . Let be the set of all l-forms in , be the space of all differential l-forms in Ω, and be the l-forms in Ω satisfying for all ordered l-tuples I, . We denote the exterior derivative by d and the Hodge star operator by ⋆. The Hodge codifferential operator is given by , . For the vector-valued differential form
consists of differential forms , where the partial differentiation is applied to the coefficients of ω. The nonlinear partial differential equation
is called non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation, where and satisfy the conditions
for almost every and all . Here are constants, and is a fixed exponent associated with (1.1). A solution to (1.1) is an element of the Sobolev space such that
for all with compact support. If u is a function (0-form) in , equation (1.1) reduces to
If the operator , equation (1.1) becomes
which is called the (homogeneous) A-harmonic equation. Let be defined by with . Then A satisfies the required conditions, and (1.5) becomes the p-harmonic equation for differential forms. See [1–3, 12–16] for recent results on the A-harmonic equations and related topics.
Assume that is a bounded, convex domain. The following operator with the case was first introduced by Cartan in [8]. Then it was extended to the following general version in [6]. For each , a linear operator defined by and the decomposition correspond. A homotopy operator is defined by an averaging over all points y in D
where is normalized by . For simplicity purpose, we write . Then . By substituting and , we have
where the vector function is given by . The integral (1.7) defines a bounded operator , , and the decomposition
holds for any differential form u. The l-form is defined by
for all , . Also, for any differential form u, we have
From [[17], p.16], we know that any open subset Ω in is the union of a sequence of cubes , whose sides are parallel to the axes, whose interiors are mutually disjoint, and whose diameters are approximately proportional to their distances from F. Specifically,
-
(i)
,
-
(ii)
if ,
-
(iii)
there exist two constants (we can take , and ), so that
(1.11)
Thus, the definition of the homotopy operator T can be generalized to any domain Ω in : For any , for some k. Let be the homotopy operator defined on (each cube is bounded and convex). Thus, we can define the homotopy operator on any domain Ω by
Recently, Hui Bi extended the definition of the potential operator to the case of differential forms, see [3]. For any differential l-form , the potential operator P is defined by
where the kernel is a nonnegative measurable function defined for , and the summation is over all ordered l-tuples I. The case reduces to the usual potential operator,
where is a function defined on . See [3] and [9] for more results about the potential operator. We say a kernel K on satisfies the standard estimates if there exist δ, and a constant C such that for all distinct points x and y in , and all z with , the kernel K satisfies
-
(i)
;
-
(ii)
;
-
(iii)
.
In this paper, we always assume that P is the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Recently, Hui Bi in [3] proved the following inequality for the potential operator.
where , , is a differential form defined in a bounded and convex domain E, and is a constant.
2 Local imbedding inequalities
In this section, we prove the local imbedding inequalities for applied to solutions of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation in a bounded domain. We will need the following definitions and a notation. A continuously increasing function with , is called an Orlicz function. The Orlicz space consists of all measurable functions f on Ω such that for some . is equipped with the nonlinear Luxemburg functional
A convex Orlicz function φ is often called a Young function. If φ is a Young function, then defines a norm in , which is called the Luxemburg norm or Orlicz norm. For any subset , we use to denote the Orlicz-Sobolev space of l-forms, which equals with the norm
If we choose , in (2.1), we obtain the usual norm for
Definition 2.1 [18]
We say a Young function φ lies in the class , , , if (i) and (ii) for all , where g is a convex increasing function, and h is a concave increasing function on .
From [18], each of φ, g and h in above definition is doubling in the sense that its values at t and 2t are uniformly comparable for all , and the consequent fact that
where and are constants. Also, for all and , the function belongs to for some constant . Here is defined by for ; and for . Particularly, if , we see that lies in , . We will need the following reverse Hölder inequality.
Lemma 2.2 [19]
Let u be a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in a domain Ω and . Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with for some .
We first prove the following local inequality for the composition with the -norm.
Theorem 2.3 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let Ω be a bounded and convex domain, let , , be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with .
Proof Since and hold for any differential form u, we have
Using (1.15) and noticing for any differential form, it follows that
for , Replacing u by in (2.5) and using (1.10) and (2.6), we obtain
for any differential form u and all balls B with . From Lemma 2.2, for any positive numbers p and q, it follows that
where σ is a constant . Using Jensen’s inequality for , (2.2), (2.7), (2.8), (i) in Definition 2.1, and noticing the fact that φ and h are doubling, and φ is an increasing function, we obtain
Since , then . Hence, we have . Note that φ is doubling, we obtain
Combining (2.9) and (2.10) and using yields
Since each of φ, g and h in Definition 2.1 is doubling, from (2.11), we have
for all balls B with and any constant . From (2.1) and the last inequality, we have the following inequality with the Luxemburg norm
The proof of Theorem 2.3 has been completed. □
In order to prove our main local imbedding theorem, we will need the following Theorems 2.4 and 2.5.
Theorem 2.4 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let Ω be a bounded and convex domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with .
Proof Using (1.10), we have
for any differential form u and . Using (1.15) and the fact that , and noticing that
holds for any differential form u, we obtain
for all balls B with . From (2.13) and (2.14), it follows that
By Lemma 2.2, for any positive numbers p and q, it follows that
where σ is a constant . Using Jensen’s inequality for , (2.2), (2.15), (2.16), (i) in Definition 2.1, and noticing the fact that φ and h are doubling, and φ is an increasing function, we obtain
Since , then . Hence, we have
Note that φ is doubling, we obtain
Combining (2.17) and (2.18) yields
Since each of φ, g and h in Definition 2.1 is doubling, from (2.19), we have
for all balls B with and any constant . From (2.1) and (2.20), we have the following inequality with the Luxemburg norm
The proof of Theorem 2.4 has been completed. □
Theorem 2.5 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let Ω be a bounded and convex domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with .
Proof Replacing u by in the first inequality in (1.10), we find that
holds for any differential form u and . From (2.14), we have
Combining (2.23) and (2.24) yields
for all balls B with . Starting with (2.25) and using the similar method as we did in the proof of Theorem 2.4, we can obtain
The proof of Theorem 2.5 has been completed. □
Now, we are ready to present and prove the main local theorem, the -imbedding theorem, as follows.
Theorem 2.6 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let Ω be a bounded and convex domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with .
Proof From (2.1), (2.12) and (2.22), we have
for all balls B with , where . The proof of Theorem 2.6 has been completed. □
The following version of local imbedding will be used in Section 3 to establish a global imbedding theorem which indicates that the operator is bounded.
Theorem 2.7 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let Ω be a bounded and convex domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
for all balls B with .
Proof Applying (1.10) to , then using (1.15), we find that
and
for any differential form u and all balls B with , where is a constant. Starting with (2.30) and (2.31) and using the similar method developed in the proof of Theorem 2.5, we obtain
and
respectively, where and are constants. From (2.1), (2.32) and (2.33), we have
where . The proof of Theorem 2.7 has been completed. □
Note that if we choose or in Theorems 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7, we will obtain some -norm or -norm inequalities, respectively. For example, let in Theorem 2.6, we have the following imbedding inequalities for with the -norms.
Corollary 2.8 Let , and . Assume that , and u is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1). Then there exists a constant C, independent of u such that
for all balls B with , where is a constant.
Selecting in Theorem 2.6, we obtain the usual imbedding inequalities with the -norms.
for all balls B with , where is a constant. Similarly, if we choose or in Theorems 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.7, respectively, we will obtain the corresponding special results.
3 Global imbedding theorem
We have established the local -norm and -imbedding inequalities for and some composite operators related to the imbedding theorem for . In this section, we prove the global -imbedding theorem in the following -averaging domains.
Definition 3.1 [20]
Let φ be an increasing convex function on with . We call a proper subdomain an -averaging domain if , and there exists a constant C such that
for some ball and all u such that , where τ, σ are constants with , and the supremum is over all balls .
From the definition above, we see that -averaging domains are special -averaging domains when in Definition 3.1. Also, uniform domains and the John domains are very special -averaging domains, see [1] and [20] for more results about the averaging domains.
Lemma 3.2 [19] (Covering lemma)
Each Ω has a modified Whitney cover of cubes such that , and some , and if , then there exists a cube R (this cube need not be a member of ) in such that . Moreover, if Ω is δ-John, then there is a distinguished cube , which can be connected with every cube by a chain of cubes from and such that , , for some .
Now, we are ready to prove another main theorem, the global imbedding theorem with the -norm, as follows.
Theorem 3.3 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , let , Ω be any convex bounded -averaging domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of v, such that
where is some fixed ball.
Proof Since , it follows that , and hence . Note that is a closed form, then . Thus,
Applying the first inequality in (1.10) to , we have
for any ball B and . Starting from (3.4), and using the similar method to the proof of Theorem 2.4, we obtain
where is a constant. From the covering lemma and (3.5), it follows that
where N is a positive integer appearing in the covering lemma. Letting and using (2.11), we find that
From (2.1), (3.6) and (3.7), we have
We have completed the proof of Theorem 3.3. □
It is well known that any John domain is a special -averaging domain [1]. Hence, we have the following global -imbedding theorem for the John domains.
Theorem 3.4 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , let , Ω be any convex bounded John domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of v, such that
where is some fixed ball.
Choosing in Theorems 3.3, we obtain the following imbedding inequality with the -norms.
Corollary 3.5 Let , , , Ω be any convex bounded -averaging domain, let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of v, such that
where is some fixed ball.
Next, let S be the set of all solutions of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation in Ω. We have the following version of imbedding theorem with norm for any bounded domain, which says that the composite operator maps continuously into .
Theorem 3.6 Let φ be a Young function in the class , , , let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6), and let P be the potential operator defined in (1.13) with the kernel satisfying condition (i) of the standard estimates. Assume that , and in Ω. Then the composite operator maps continuously into . Furthermore, there exists a constant C, independent of v, such that
holds for any bounded domain Ω.
Proof Let be a solution of equation (1.1). Since the composite operator is continuous if and only if it is bounded, we only need to prove that (3.11) holds. Using (2.29) and the Lemma 3.2, we obtain
Hence, inequality (3.11) holds. We have completed the proof of Theorem 3.6. □
Selecting in Theorems 3.3, we have the following version of the imbedding inequality with -norms.
Corollary 3.7 Let , , let T be the homotopy operator defined in (1.6) and P be the potential operator defined in (1.13). Assume that , and is a solution of the non-homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.1) in Ω. Then there exists a constant C, independent of v, such that
holds for any bounded domain Ω.
4 Examples
In this last section, we will present two examples to show applications of our imbedding theorems. All of our local and global inequalities work for these two examples. We should note that functions are 0-forms. Thus, all of our theorems proved in this paper will work for harmonic functions. For example, choose u to be a function (0-form) in the homogeneous A-harmonic equation (1.5), then (1.5) reduces to the following A-harmonic equation
for functions. Assume that with . Then, the operator satisfies the required conditions (1.2) and the equation (4.1) becomes the usual p-harmonic equation for functions
which is equivalent to
If we choose in (4.2), we have the Laplace equation for functions. Thus, from Theorem 3.3, we have the following inequality for harmonic functions.
Example 4.1 Let u be a solution of the usual A-harmonic equation (4.1) or the p-harmonic equation (4.2), let φ be a Young function in the class , , , and let Ω be any bounded -averaging domain. If , then there exists a constant C, independent of u, such that
where is some fixed ball.
Example 4.2 Let be a function (0-form) defined in by
We can check that satisfies the Laplace equation in the upper half plane, that is, is a harmonic function in the upper half plane. Let be a constant, let be a fixed point with and . To obtain the upper bound for the Orlicz-Sobolev-norm directly, it would be very complicated. However, using Theorem 2.6 with , we can easily obtain the upper bound of the Orlicz-Sobolev-norm as follows. First, we know that and
Applying (2.27) and (4.4), we have
Remark
-
(i)
We know that the -averaging domains are the special -averaging domains. Thus, Theorem 3.3 also holds for the -averaging domain;
-
(ii)
Theorem 3.6 holds for any bounded domain in .
References
Agarwal RP, Ding S, Nolder CA: Inequalities for Differential Forms. Springer, Berlin; 2009.
Bao G: -Weighted integral inequalities for A -harmonic tensors. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2000, 247: 466–477. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.6851
Bi H: Weighted inequalities for potential operators on differential forms. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 713625
Ding S: Two-weight Caccioppoli inequalities for solutions of nonhomogeneous A -harmonic equations on Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 2367–2375. 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07347-2
Fang R, Ding S: Singular integrals of the compositions of Laplace-Beltrami and Green’s operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011. 10.1186/1029-242X-2011-74
Iwaniec T, Lutoborski A: Integral estimates for null Lagrangians. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1993, 125: 25–79. 10.1007/BF00411477
Liu B: -Weighted imbedding inequalities for A -harmonic tensors. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 273(2):667–676. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00331-1
Cartan H: Differential Forms. Houghton Mifflin, Boston; 1970.
Martell JM: Fractional integrals, potential operators and two-weight, weak type norm inequalities on spaces of homogeneous type. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 294: 223–236. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.012
Sachs SK, Wu H: General Relativity for Mathematicians. Springer, New York; 1977.
Westenholz C: Differential Forms in Mathematical Physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1978.
Wang Y, Wu C: Sobolev imbedding theorems and Poincaré inequalities for Green’s operator on solutions of the nonhomogeneous A -harmonic equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47: 1545–1554. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.006
Wang Y:Two-weight Poincaré type inequalities for differential forms in -averaging domains. Appl. Math. Lett. 2007, 20: 1161–1166. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.02.003
Xing Y: Weighted Poincaré-type estimates for conjugate A -harmonic tensors. J. Inequal. Appl. 2005, 1: 1–6.
Xing Y: Weighted integral inequalities for solutions of the A -harmonic equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2003, 279: 350–363. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00036-2
Xing Y, Wu C: Global weighted inequalities for operators and harmonic forms on manifolds. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 294: 294–309. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.018
Stein EM: Harmonic Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 1993.
Buckley SM, Koskela P: Orlicz-Hardy inequalities. Ill. J. Math. 2004, 48: 787–802.
Nolder CA: Hardy-Littlewood theorems for A -harmonic tensors. Ill. J. Math. 1999, 43: 613–631.
Ding S:-Averaging domains and the quasihyperbolic metric. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47: 1611–1618. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, Y., Ding, S. Imbedding inequalities with -norms for composite operators. J Inequal Appl 2013, 544 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-544
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-544