Skip to main content

An exact upper bound estimate for the number of integer points on the elliptic curves y 2 = x 3 p k x

Abstract

Let p be a fixed prime and k be a fixed odd positive integer. Further let N( p k ) denote the number of pairs of integer points (x,±y) on the elliptic curve E: y 2 = x 3 p k x with y>0. Using some properties of the Diophantine equations, we gave an exact upper bound estimate for N( p k ). That is, we proved that N( p k )4.

MSC:11G05, 11Y50.

1 Introduction

Let , be the sets of all integers and positive integers, respectively. Let p be a fixed prime and k be a fixed positive integer. Recently, the integer points on the elliptic curve

E: y 2 = x 3 p k x
(1.1)

have been investigated in many papers (see [13] and [4]). In this paper we will deal with the number of integer points on (1.1) for odd k.

An integer point (x,y) on (1.1) is called trivial or non-trivial according to whether y=0 or not. Obviously, for odd k, (1.1) has only the trivial integer point (x,y)=(0,0). If (x,y) is a non-trivial integer point on (1.1), then (x,y) is too. Therefore, (x,y) along with (x,y) are called a pair of non-trivial integer points and denoted by (x,±y) with y>0. Let a, b be coprime positive integers and s be a nonnegative integer. Using some properties of the Diophantine equations, we give an exact upper bound estimate for N( p k ). That is, we shall prove the following results.

Theorem 1.1 For any odd integer k1, all non-trivial integer points on (1.1) are given as follows:

  1. (i)

    p=2, k=4s+1, (x,±y)=( 2 2 s ,± 2 3 s ), ( 2 2 s + 1 ,± 2 3 s + 1 ) and ( 2 2 s + 1 169,± 2 3 s + 1 3107).

  2. (ii)

    p=2, k=4s+3, (x,±y)=( 2 2 s 9,± 2 3 s 21).

  3. (iii)

    p=23, k=4s+3, (x,±y)=( 23 2 s 6084,± 23 3 s 474474).

  4. (iv)

    p=2 a 2 1, k=4s+1, (x,±y)=( p 2 s a 2 ,± p 3 s a( a 2 1)).

  5. (v)

    p= a 4 + b 2 , k=4s+1, (x,±y)=( p 2 s a 2 ,± p 3 s ab).

  6. (vi)

    p 3 = a 4 + b 2 , k=4s+3, (x,±y)=( p 2 s a 2 ,± p 3 s ab).

  7. (vii)

    p is an odd prime with p1(mod4),

    k = { 4 s + 1 , 4 s + 3 , ( x , ± y ) = { ( p 2 s + ( n + 1 ) / 2 Y 2 , ± p 3 s + ( n + 3 ) / 4 X Y ) , n 1 ( mod 4 ) , ( p 2 s + ( n + 3 ) / 2 Y 2 , ± p 3 s + ( n + 9 ) / 4 X Y ) , n 3 ( mod 4 ) ,

where (X,Y,n) is a solution of the equation

X 2 p n Y 4 =1,X,Y,nN,2n.
(1.2)

Theorem 1.2 Let N( p k ) denote the number of pairs of non-trivial integer points on (1.1). For odd k, if p1(mod4), then

N ( p k ) = { 3 , for  p = 2  and  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , 1 , for  p = 2  and  k 3 ( mod 4 ) , p = 23  and  k 3 ( mod 4 ) , or  p = 2 a 2 1  and  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , 0 , otherwise .
(1.3)

If p1(mod4), then

N ( p k ) { 4 , for  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , 2 , for  k 3 ( mod 4 ) .
(1.4)

2 Preliminaries

Lemma 2.1 ([5])

The equation

X 2 2 Y 4 =1,X,YN
(2.1)

has only the solutions (X,Y)=(1,1) and (239,13).

Lemma 2.2 ([[6], Theorem D])

Let D be a non-square positive integer. If D3, then the equation

X 2 D Y 4 =1,X,YN
(2.2)

has at most one solution (X,Y).

Lemma 2.3 ([7])

The equation

X 2 Y n =1,X,Y,nN,min{X,Y,n}>1
(2.3)

has only the solution (X,Y,n)=(3,2,3).

Lemma 2.4 ([[8], Proposition 8.1])

The equation

2 X 2 Y n =1,X,YN,min{X,Y}>1,2n
(2.4)

has only the solutions (X,Y,n)=(78,23,3) and (a,2 a 2 1,1), where a is a positive integer with a>1.

Lemma 2.5 The equation

X 4 Y 2 = 2 n ,X,Y,nN,gcd(X,Y)=1
(2.5)

has only the solution (X,Y,n)=(3,7,5).

Proof By (2.5), since gcd(X,Y)=1, both X and Y are odd and gcd( X 2 +Y, X 2 Y)=2. Hence, we have X 2 +Y= 2 n 1 , X 2 Y=2 and

X 2 = 2 n 2 +1,Y= 2 n 2 1.
(2.6)

Applying Lemma 2.3 to the first equality of (2.6), we only get X=3 and n=5. Therefore, by the second equality of (2.6), (2.5) has only the solution (X,Y,n)=(3,7,5). The lemma is proved. □

Lemma 2.6 If p is an odd prime, then the equation

X 4 Y 2 = p n ,X,Y,nN,gcd(X,Y)=1,2n
(2.7)

has only the solutions (p,X,Y,n)=(23,78,6083,3) and (2 a 2 1,a, a 2 1,1), where a is a positive integer with a>1.

Proof By (2.7), since 2p and gcd(X,Y)=1, we have 2XY, gcd( X 2 +Y, X 2 Y)=1, X 2 +Y= p n , X 2 Y=1 and

2 X 2 = p n +1,2Y= p n 1.
(2.8)

Since 2n, applying Lemma 2.4 to the first equality of (2.8), we get either (X,p,n)=(78,23,3) or (X,p,n)=(a,2 a 2 1,1). Thus, by the second equality of (2.8), the lemma is proved. □

Lemma 2.7 ([[9], Theorem 278])

For any fixed positive integer n, if p1(mod4), then the equation

X 2 + Y 2 = p n ,X,YN,gcd(X,Y)=1,2Y
(2.9)

has exactly one solution (X,Y). If p3(mod4), then (2.9) has no solution.

Lemma 2.8 ([[10], p.630])

The equation

X 4 + Y 4 = Z 3 ,X,Y,ZN,gcd(X,Y)=1
(2.10)

has no solution (X,Y,Z).

Lemma 2.9 ([[11], Theorem 1])

The equation

X 4 + Y 2 = Z n ,X,Y,Z,nN,gcd(X,Y)=1,n>3
(2.11)

has no solution (X,Y,Z,n).

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Assume that 2k and (x,±y) is a pair of non-trivial integer points on (1.1). Since y>0, we have x0 and either 0>x> p k / 2 or x> p k / 2 .

We first consider the case that 0>x> p k / 2 . Then x can be expressed as

x= p r z,rZ,r0,zN,pz.
(3.1)

Applying (3.1) to (1.1) yields

p 3 r z ( p k 2 r z 2 ) = y 2 .
(3.2)

Further, since pz and p k > x 2 p 2 r , we have pz( p k 2 r z 2 ) and gcd(z, p k 2 r z 2 )=1. Therefore, by (3.2), we get

r=2s,z= f 2 , p k 2 r z 2 = g 2 ,y= p 3 s fg,f,g,sN,gcd(f,g)=1,
(3.3)

whence we obtain

f 4 + g 2 = p k 4 s .
(3.4)

If p=2, then from (3.4) we get k4s=1 and f=g=1. Hence, by (3.1) and (3.3), we obtain

p=2,k=4s+1,(x,±y)= ( 2 2 s , ± 2 3 s ) .
(3.5)

If p is an odd prime, applying Lemma 2.9 to (3.4), we get either k4s=1 or k4s=3. Therefore, by (3.1), (3.3), and (3.4), we obtain the integer points of types (v) and (vi).

We next consider the case that x> p k / 2 . Then x can be expressed as

x= p r z,rZ,r0,zN,pz.
(3.6)

Case I: k>2r.

By (1.1) and (3.6), we have

p 3 r z ( z 2 p k 2 r ) = y 2 .
(3.7)

Since pz( z 2 p k 2 r ) and gcd(z, z 2 p k 2 r )=1, by (3.7), we get

r = 2 s , z = f 2 , z 2 p k 2 r = g 2 , y = p 3 s f g , s Z , s 0 , f , g N , gcd ( f , g ) = 1 ,
(3.8)

and hence,

f 4 g 2 = p k 4 s .
(3.9)

If p=2, applying Lemma 2.5 to (3.9), we get k4s=3, f=3 and g=7. Therefore, by (3.6) and (3.8), we obtain the integer points of type (ii).

If p is an odd prime, applying Lemma 2.6 to (3.9) yields either p=23, k4s=3, f=78 and g=6083 or p=2 a 2 1, k4s=1, f=a, and g= a 2 1. Therefore, by (3.6) and (3.8), we obtain the integer points of types (iii) and (iv).

Case II: k<2r.

Then we have p r + k z( p 2 r k z 2 1)= y 2 and

r + k = 2 t , z = f 2 , p 2 r k z 2 1 = g 2 , y = p t f g , f , g , t N , gcd ( f , g ) = 1 ,
(3.10)

whence we get

g 2 p 4 t 3 k f 4 =1.
(3.11)

If p=2, then from (3.11) we get 4t3k=1. It implies that t1(mod3) and t=3s+1, where s is a nonnegative integer. Hence, we have k=4s+1 and r=2s+1. Further, by Lemma 2.1, we get from (3.11) that (f,g)=(1,1) and (239,13). Therefore, by (3.6) and (3.10), we obtain

p=2,k=4s+1,(x,±y)= ( 2 2 s + 1 , ± 2 3 s + 1 ) , ( 2 2 s + 1 169 , ± 2 3 s + 1 3107 ) .
(3.12)

If p is an odd prime, we see from (3.11) that (1.2) has a solution

(X,Y,n)=(g,f,4t3k).
(3.13)

While n1(mod4), since n4t3k3k1(mod4), we have k1(mod4) and k=4s+1, where s is a nonnegative integer. Hence, we get t=3s+(n+3)/4 and r=2s+(n+1)/2. Therefore, by (3.6), (3.10), and (3.13), we obtain

k=4s+1,(x,±y)= ( p 2 s + ( n + 1 ) / 2 Y 2 , ± p 3 s + ( n + 3 ) / 4 X Y ) .
(3.14)

While n3(mod4), since n4t3k3k3(mod4), we have k3(mod4) and k=4s+3. Hence, we get t=3s+(n+9)/4 and r=2s+(n+3)/2. Therefore, by (3.6), (3.10), and (3.13), we obtain

k=4s+3,(x,±y)= ( p 2 s + ( n + 3 ) / 2 Y 2 , ± p 3 s + ( n + 9 ) / 4 X Y ) .
(3.15)

Combining of (3.14) and (3.15), we get the integer points of type (vii).

Finally, by (3.5) and (3.12), we obtain the integer points of type (i). To sum up, all non-trivial integer points on (1.1) are determined. The theorem is proved.

4 Proof of Theorem 1.2

Since p1(mod4) if (1.1) has integer points belonging to one of types (v), (vi), and (vii), by Theorem 1.1, (1.3) is true.

For p1(mod4), let N j (j=4,5,6,7) denote the number of pairs of integer points of types (iv), (v), (vi), and (vii) respectively. Then we have

N ( p k ) = N 4 + N 5 + N 6 + N 7 .
(4.1)

Since p and k are fixed, we get

N 4 { 1 , if  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , = 0 , if  k 3 ( mod 4 ) .
(4.2)

By Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8, we have

N 5 { 2 , if  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , = 0 , if  k 3 ( mod 4 ) , N 6 { = 0 , if  k 1 ( mod 4 ) , 1 , if  k 3 ( mod 4 ) .
(4.3)

On the other hand, for any fixed δ{1,3}, by Lemma 2.2, (1.2) has at most one solution (X,Y,n) satisfying nδ(mod4). It implies that

N 7 1.
(4.4)

Therefore, the combination of (4.1)-(4.4) yields (1.4). The theorem is proved.

References

  1. Draziotis KA: Integer points on the curve Y 2 = X 3 ± p k X. Math. Comput. 2006,75(255):1493-1505. 10.1090/S0025-5718-06-01852-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujita Y, Terai N:Integer points and independent points on the elliptic curve y 2 = x 3 p k x. Tokyo J. Math. 2011,34(2):367-381. 10.3836/tjm/1327931392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh PG:Integer solutions to the equation y 2 =x( x 2 ± p k ). Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2008,38(4):1285-1302. 10.1216/RMJ-2008-38-4-1285

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh PG: Maximal ranks and integer points on a family of elliptic curves. Glas. Mat. 2009,44(1):83-87. 10.3336/gm.44.1.04

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ljunggren W:Zur Theorie der Gleichung x 2 +1=D y 4 . Avh. Nor. Vidensk. Akad. Oslo 1942,1(5):1-27.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J-H, Voutier PM:Complete solution of the Diophantine equation X 2 +1=d Y 4 and a related family of quartic Thue equation. J. Number Theory 1997,62(1):71-99. 10.1006/jnth.1997.2018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ko C:On the Diophantine equation x 2 = y n +1, xy0. Sci. Sin. 1964,14(5):457-460.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett MA, Skinner CM: Ternary Diophantine equations via Galois representations and modular forms. Can. J. Math. 2004,56(1):23-54. 10.4153/CJM-2004-002-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy GH, Wright EM: An Introduction to Number Theory. 5th edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dickson LE: History of the Theory of Numbers. Chelsea, New York; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett MA, Ellenberg JS, Ng NC:The Diophantine equation A 4 + 2 δ B 2 = C n . Int. J. Number Theory 2010,6(2):311-338. 10.1142/S1793042110002971

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referee for his very helpful and detailed comments, which have significantly improved the presentation of this paper. This work is supported by the S. R. P. F. (12JK0883) of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department and G. I. C. F. (YZZ13075) of NWU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoxue Li.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

GS obtained the theorems and completed the proof. LX corrected and improved the final version. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gou, S., Li, X. An exact upper bound estimate for the number of integer points on the elliptic curves y 2 = x 3 p k x. J Inequal Appl 2014, 187 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-187

Keywords