Skip to main content

Inequalities and asymptotic expansions associated with the Wallis sequence

Abstract

We present the asymptotic expansions of functions involving the ratio of gamma functions and provide formulas for determining the coefficients of the asymptotic expansions. As consequences, we obtain the asymptotic expansions of the Wallis sequence. Also, we establish inequalities for the Wallis sequence.

MSC:40A05, 33B15, 41A60, 26D15.

1 Introduction

The Wallis sequence to which the title refers is

W n = k = 1 n 4 k 2 4 k 2 1 ,nN:={1,2,3,}.
(1.1)

Wallis (1616-1703) discovered that

k = 1 4 k 2 4 k 2 1 = 2 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 7 = π 2
(1.2)

(see [[1], p.68]). Based on Wallis’ infinite product (1.2), the first infinite continued fraction of π was given by Brouncker (1620-1684):

4 π =1+ 1 2 + 9 2 + 25 2 + 49 2 + .
(1.3)

Euler’s analysis of Wallis’ proof led him to formulas for the gamma and beta functions. Stirling (1692-1770) used (1.2) to determine the constant factor in his asymptotic formula

n! 2 π n ( n e ) n ,n.

Several elementary proofs of (1.2) can be found (see, for example, [24]). An interesting geometric construction produces (1.2) [5]. Many formulas exist for the representation of π, and a collection of these formulas is listed in [6, 7]. For more on the history of π see [1, 810].

Some inequalities and asymptotic formulas associated with the Wallis sequence W n can be found (see, for example, [1123]). In [13], Hirschhorn proved that for nN,

π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 7 3 ) < W n < π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 8 3 ) .
(1.4)

Also in [13], Hirschhorn pointed out that if the c j are given by

tanh ( x 4 ) = j = 0 c j x 2 j + 1 ( 2 j ) ! ,
(1.5)

then, as n,

W n π 2 ( 1 + 1 2 n ) 1 j 0 exp ( c j n 2 j + 1 ) = π 2 ( 1 + 1 2 n ) 1 exp ( j = 0 c j n 2 j + 1 ) .
(1.6)

Remark 1 It is well known (see [[24], p.85]) that

tanhz= k = 1 2 2 k ( 2 2 k 1 ) B 2 k ( 2 k ) ! z 2 k 1 ,|z|< π 2 ,

where B n (n N 0 :=N{0}) are the Bernoulli numbers. We then obtain

tanh ( x 4 ) = j = 0 ( 2 2 j + 2 1 ) B 2 j + 2 2 2 j + 1 ( 2 j + 1 ) ( j + 1 ) x 2 j + 1 ( 2 j ) ! ,|x|<2π.
(1.7)

Thus we have

c j = ( 2 2 j + 2 1 ) B 2 j + 2 2 2 j + 1 ( 2 j + 1 ) ( j + 1 ) ,j N 0 :=N{0}.
(1.8)

Let r0 be a given real number and 0 be a given integer. The first aim of this paper is to determine the coefficients c j (,r) (for jN) such that

W(x) π 2 ( 1 + j = 1 c j ( , r ) x j ) x / r as x,

where the function W(x) is defined by

W(x)= π 2 ( 1 + 1 2 x ) 1 1 x [ Γ ( x + 1 ) Γ ( x + 1 2 ) ] 2 .
(1.9)

Clearly, W n =W(n). The second aim of this paper is to establish inequalities for the Wallis sequence W n .

2 A useful lemma

The classical Euler’s gamma function is defined for x>0 by

Γ(x)= 0 t x 1 e t dt.

The logarithmic derivative of Γ(x), denoted by ψ(x)= Γ (x)/Γ(x), is called psi (or digamma) function, and ψ ( k ) (x) (kN) are called polygamma functions.

The following lemma is required in our present investigation.

Lemma 1 ([[25], Corollary 2.1])

Let m,nN. Then for x>0,

j = 1 2 m ( 1 1 2 2 j ) 2 B 2 j ( 2 j ) ! ( 2 j + n 2 ) ! x 2 j + n 1 < ( 1 ) n ( ψ ( n 1 ) ( x + 1 ) ψ ( n 1 ) ( x + 1 2 ) ) + ( n 1 ) ! 2 x n < j = 1 2 m 1 ( 1 1 2 2 j ) 2 B 2 j ( 2 j ) ! ( 2 j + n 2 ) ! x 2 j + n 1 ,
(2.1)

where B n are the Bernoulli numbers.

It follows from (2.1) that, for x>0,

L(x)<ψ(x+1)ψ ( x + 1 2 ) <U(x),
(2.2)

where

L ( x ) = 1 2 x 1 8 x 2 + 1 64 x 4 1 128 x 6 + 17 2 , 048 x 8 31 2 , 048 x 10 + 691 16 , 384 x 12 5 , 461 32 , 768 x 14

and

U ( x ) = 1 2 x 1 8 x 2 + 1 64 x 4 1 128 x 6 + 17 2 , 048 x 8 31 2 , 048 x 10 + 691 16 , 384 x 12 5 , 461 32 , 768 x 14 + 929 , 569 1 , 048 , 576 x 16 .

In Section 4, the proofs of Theorems 3 and 4 make use of inequality (2.2).

3 Asymptotic expansions

The logarithm of gamma function has asymptotic expansion (see [[26], p.32]):

lnΓ(x+t) ( x + t 1 2 ) lnxx+ 1 2 ln(2π)+ n = 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 B n + 1 ( t ) n ( n + 1 ) 1 x n
(3.1)

as x, where B n (t) denotes the Bernoulli polynomials defined by the following generating function:

x e t x e x 1 = n = 0 B n (t) x n n ! .
(3.2)

Note that the Bernoulli numbers B n (for n N 0 ) are defined by (3.2) for t=0.

From (3.1), we obtain, as x,

[ Γ ( x + t ) Γ ( x + s ) ] 1 / ( t s ) xexp ( 1 t s j = 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 ( B j + 1 ( t ) B j + 1 ( s ) ) j ( j + 1 ) 1 x j ) .
(3.3)

Setting (s,t)=( 1 2 ,1) and noting that

B n (0)= ( 1 ) n B n (1)= B n and B n ( 1 2 ) = ( 2 1 n 1 ) B n for n N 0

(see [[24], p.805]), we obtain from (3.3), as x,

[ Γ ( x + 1 ) Γ ( x + 1 2 ) ] 2 xexp ( j = 1 2 ( 1 ( 1 ) j + 1 ( 2 j 1 ) ) B j + 1 j ( j + 1 ) 1 x j ) ,
(3.4)

or

1 x [ Γ ( x + 1 ) Γ ( x + 1 2 ) ] 2 exp ( j = 0 ( 2 2 2 j 1 ) B 2 j + 2 ( 2 j + 1 ) ( j + 1 ) 1 x 2 j + 1 ) .
(3.5)

We see from (1.6) and (1.9) that

1 n [ Γ ( n + 1 ) Γ ( n + 1 2 ) ] 2 exp ( j = 0 c j n 2 j + 1 ) ,n,
(3.6)

with the coefficients c j given by (1.5). From (3.5) and (3.6), we retrieve (1.8).

By using the Maclaurin expansion of ln(1+x),

ln(1+x)= j = 1 ( 1 ) j 1 j x j for 1<x1,

we obtain

( 1 + 1 2 x ) 1 exp ( j = 1 ( 1 ) j j 2 j 1 x j ) as x.
(3.7)

Applying (3.4) and (3.7) yields

W(x) π 2 exp ( j = 1 b j x j ) as x,
(3.8)

with the coefficients b j (for jN) given by

b j = ( 1 ) j 1 ( 1 j 2 j + 2 ( ( 1 ) j + 1 ( 2 j 1 ) ) B j + 1 j ( j + 1 ) ) .
(3.9)

From (3.8), we obtain the following asymptotic expansion for the Wallis sequence W n :

W n π 2 exp ( 1 4 n + 1 8 n 2 5 96 n 3 + 1 64 n 4 1 320 n 5 + 1 384 n 6 25 7 , 168 n 7 + 1 2 , 048 n 8 + 29 9 , 216 n 9 + 1 10 , 240 n 10 695 90 , 112 n 11 + ) , n .
(3.10)

Using e x = j = 0 x j j ! , from (3.10) we deduce that

W n π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 5 32 n 2 11 128 n 3 + 83 2 , 048 n 4 143 8 , 192 n 5 + 625 65 , 536 n 6 1 , 843 262 , 144 n 7 + 24 , 323 8 , 388 , 608 n 8 + 61 , 477 33 , 554 , 432 n 9 14 , 165 268 , 435 , 456 n 10 8 , 084 , 893 1 , 073 , 741 , 824 n 11 + ) .
(3.11)

Even though as many coefficients as we please on the right-hand side of (3.11) can be obtained by using Mathematica, here we aim at giving a formula for determining these coefficients. In fact, Theorem 1 below presents a general asymptotic expansion for W(x) which includes (3.11) as its special case.

Theorem 1 Let r0 be a given real number and 0 be a given integer. Then the function W(x), as defined in (1.9), has the following asymptotic expansion:

W(x) π 2 ( 1 + j = 1 c j ( , r ) x j ) x / r as x
(3.12)

with the coefficients c j (,r) (for jN) given by

c j (,r)= r k 1 + k 2 + + k j k 1 ! k 2 ! k j ! b 1 k 1 b 2 k 2 b j k j ,
(3.13)

where b j are given in (3.9), summed over all non-negative integers k j satisfying the equation

(1+) k 1 +(2+) k 2 ++(j+) k j =j.

Proof In view of (1.6), we can let

( 2 π W ( x ) ) r / x =1+ j = 1 m c j ( , r ) x j +O ( x m 1 ) as x,
(3.14)

where c 1 (,r),, c m (,r) are real numbers to be determined. Write (3.8) as

ln ( 2 π W ( x ) ) = k = 1 m b k x k + R m (x),

where R m (x)=O( x m 1 ). Further, we have

( 2 π W ( x ) ) r / x = e r R m ( x ) / x e k = 1 m r b k x k + = e r R m ( x ) / x k = 1 m [ 1 + ( r b k x k + ) + 1 2 ! ( r b k x k + ) 2 + ] = e r R m ( x ) / x k 1 = 0 k 2 = 0 k m = 0 1 k 1 ! k 2 ! k m ! × ( r b 1 x 1 + ) k 1 ( r b 2 x 2 + ) k 2 ( r b m x m + ) k m = e r R m ( x ) / x k 1 = 0 k 2 = 0 k m = 0 r k 1 + k 2 + + k m k 1 ! k 2 ! k m ! b 1 k 1 b 2 k 2 b m k m × 1 x ( 1 + ) k 1 + ( 2 + ) k 2 + + ( m + ) k m .
(3.15)

Equating the coefficients by the equal powers of x in (3.14) and (3.15), we see that

c j (,r)= ( 1 + ) k 1 + ( 2 + ) k 2 + + ( j + ) k j = j r k 1 + k 2 + + k j k 1 ! k 2 ! k j ! b 1 k 1 b 2 k 2 b j k j .

The proof of Theorem 1 is complete. □

Theorem 1 gives an explicit formula for determining the coefficients of the asymptotic expansion (3.12). Theorem 2 below provides a recurrence relation for determining the coefficients of the asymptotic expansion (3.12).

Theorem 2 Let r0 be a given real number and 0 be a given integer. Then the function W(x), as defined in (1.9), has the following asymptotic expansion:

W(x) π 2 ( j = 0 c j ( , r ) x j ) x / r as x
(3.16)

with the coefficients c j (,r) (for j N 0 ) given by the recurrence relation:

c 0 (,r)=1and c j (,r)= r j k = 1 j b k (k+) c j k (,r)for jN,
(3.17)

where b j (for jN) are given in (3.9).

Proof Taking the logarithm of (3.8)

ln ( 2 π W ( x ) ) j = 1 b j x j as x.

Write (3.14) as

r x ln ( 2 π W ( x ) ) ln ( j = 0 c j ( , r ) x j ) as x.

It follows that

r k = 1 b k x k ln ( j = 0 c j ( , r ) x j ) as x.

Differentiating each side with respect to x yields

r ( j = 0 c j ( , r ) x j ) ( k = 1 b k ( k + ) x k 1 ) j = 1 c j (,r)j x j 1 .

Hence,

j c j (,r)=r k = 1 j b k (k+) c j k (,r)for jN

and (3.17) follows. The proof of Theorem 2 is complete. □

4 Inequalities

In this section, we establish inequalities for the Wallis sequence W n .

Theorem 3 For all nN,

π 2 α(n)< W n < π 2 β(n),
(4.1)

where

α(n)=1 1 4 n + 5 8 + 3 64 n + 1 2 + 15 64 n + 1 2 + 35 64 n + 1 2 + 63 64 n + 1 2

and

β(n)=1 1 4 n + 5 8 + 3 64 n + 1 2 + 15 64 n + 1 2 + 35 64 n + 1 2 + 63 64 n + 1 2 + 99 64 n + 1 2 .

That is,

α(n)= 32 , 768 n 5 + 77 , 824 n 4 + 133 , 120 n 3 + 116 , 672 n 2 + 55 , 416 n + 10 , 395 32 , 768 n 5 + 86 , 016 n 4 + 149 , 504 n 3 + 143 , 424 n 2 + 73 , 976 n + 16 , 413

and

β(n)= 262 , 144 n 6 + 753 , 664 n 5 + 1 , 781 , 760 n 4 + 2 , 226 , 176 n 3 + 1 , 778 , 048 n 2 + 765 , 768 n + 135 , 135 262 , 144 n 6 + 819 , 200 n 5 + 1 , 945 , 600 n 4 + 2 , 607 , 104 n 3 + 2 , 185 , 600 n 2 + 1 , 043 , 384 n + 211 , 479 .

Proof In view of the fact that

W n = π 2 1 n + 1 2 [ Γ ( n + 1 ) Γ ( n + 1 2 ) ] 2 ,

the inequality (4.1) is equivalent to

1 2 lnα(n)<lnΓ(n+1)lnΓ ( n + 1 2 ) 1 2 ln ( n + 1 2 ) < 1 2 lnβ(n).

To obtain the left-hand inequality, define f(x) for x1 by

f(x)=lnΓ(x+1)lnΓ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 ln ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 lnα(x).

Using Stirling’s formula, we find that

lim x f(x)=0.

We now show that f(x) is strictly decreasing for x3, and f(1)>f(2)>f(3), so f(n)>0 for n1. By using the second inequality in (2.2), we have

f ( x ) = ψ ( x + 1 ) ψ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 α ( x ) α ( x ) < U ( x ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 α ( x ) α ( x ) = U ( x ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 P 8 ( x ) P 10 ( x ) ,

where P k (x) is a polynomial of degree k with non-negative integer coefficients. In what follows, P k (x) has the same understanding.

On simplification, using MAPLE, we find that

f (x)< N ( x ) P 27 ( x ) ,

where N(x) is a polynomial of degree 15 with integer coefficients (some positive, some negative). It can be shown further that

N(x)=(x3) P 14 (x)+1,752,962,197,350,057,763,671,

so

N(x)>0

for x3 and so

f (x)<0

for x3. Direct computation yields

f(1)=1.83× 10 6 ,f(2)=1.92× 10 8 ,f(3)=7.06× 10 10 .

Consequently, the sequence ( f ( n ) ) n N is strictly decreasing. This leads to

f(n)> lim n f(n)=0,nN,

which means that the first inequality in (4.1) is valid for nN.

To obtain the right-hand inequality, define g(x) for x1 by

g(x)=lnΓ(x+1)lnΓ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 ln ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 lnβ(x).

Using Stirling’s formula, we find that

lim x g(x)=0.

Differentiating g(x) and applying the first inequality in (2.2), we obtain

g ( x ) = ψ ( x + 1 ) ψ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 β ( x ) β ( x ) > L ( x ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 β ( x ) β ( x ) = L ( x ) 1 2 x + 1 1 2 P 10 ( x ) P 12 ( x ) .

On simplification, using MAPLE, we find that

g (x)> 1 32 , 768 M ( x ) P 26 ( x ) ,

where M(x) is a polynomial of degree 13 with integer coefficients (some positive, some negative). It can be shown further that

M(x)=(x9) P 12 (x)+83,067,781,256,008,661,351,549,403,

so

M(x)>0

for x9 and so

g (x)>0

for x9. Direct computation yields

g ( 1 ) = 7.03 × 10 7 , g ( 2 ) = 4.217 × 10 9 , g ( 3 ) = 9.61 × 10 11 , g ( 4 ) = 4.88 × 10 12 , g ( 5 ) = 4.22 × 10 13 , g ( 6 ) = 5.3 × 10 14 , g ( 7 ) = 8.78 × 10 15 , g ( 8 ) = 1.8 × 10 15 , g ( 9 ) = 4.37 × 10 16 .

Consequently, the sequence ( g ( n ) ) n N is strictly increasing. This leads to

g(n)< lim n g(n)=0,nN,

which means that the second inequality in (4.1) is valid for nN. The proof of Theorem 3 is complete. □

We propose the following.

Conjecture 1 Let a k = ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) 64 , kN. The Wallis sequence W n has the following continued fraction representation:

W n = π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 5 8 + a 1 n + 1 2 + a 2 n + 1 2 + a 3 n + 1 2 + ) .

Theorem 4 The following inequalities hold:

π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 5 2 ) λ ( n ) < W n < π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 5 2 ) μ ( n ) ,
(4.2)

where

λ(n)=1 3 64 n 2 + 3 64 n 3 23 1 , 024 n 4

and

μ(n)=1 3 64 n 2 + 3 64 n 3 23 1 , 024 n 4 1 512 n 5 .

The first inequality holds for n5, while the second inequality is valid for all n1.

Proof Inequality (4.2) can be written as

( 1 1 4 n + 5 2 ) λ ( n ) / 2 < 1 n + 1 2 Γ ( n + 1 ) Γ ( n + 1 2 ) < ( 1 1 4 n + 5 2 ) μ ( n ) / 2 .
(4.3)

The lower bound in (4.3) is obtained by considering the function F(x) defined by

F(x)=lnΓ(x+1)lnΓ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 ln ( x + 1 2 ) λ ( x ) 2 ln ( 1 1 4 x + 5 2 ) .

Using Stirling’s formula, we find that

lim x F(x)=0.

Differentiating F(x) and applying the second inequality in (2.2), we obtain

F ( x ) = ψ ( x + 1 ) ψ ( x + 1 2 ) V ( x ) 24 x 2 36 x + 23 512 x 5 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) < U ( x ) V ( x ) 24 x 2 36 x + 23 512 x 5 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) ,

with

V(x)= 8 , 192 x 6 + 10 , 240 x 5 + 2 , 944 x 4 96 x 3 + 48 x 2 + 2 x 23 128 ( 8 x + 3 ) ( 8 x + 5 ) x 4 ( 2 x + 1 ) .

We claim that F (x)<0 for x7. It suffices to show that

G(x):= 512 x 5 ( U ( x ) V ( x ) ) 24 x 2 36 x + 23 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) <0for x7.

Differentiation yields

G (x)= R ( x ) 2 , 048 x 12 ( 8 x + 3 ) 2 ( 8 x + 5 ) 2 ( 2 x + 1 ) 2 ( 24 x 2 36 x + 23 ) 2 ,

where R(x) is a polynomial of degree 17 with integer coefficients (some positive, some negative). It can be shown further that

R(x)=(x7) P 16 (x)+89,314,236,262,237,854,773,083,

so

R(x)>0

for x7 and so

G (x)>0

for x7, and we have

G(x)< lim x G(x)=0,x7.

This proves the claim.

Hence, F(x) is strictly decreasing for x7. Direct computation yields

F(5)=2.399× 10 9 ,F(6)=1.494× 10 9 ,F(7)=7.947× 10 10 .

Consequently, the sequence (F(n)) is strictly decreasing for n5. This leads to

F(n)> lim n F(n)=0,n5,

which means that the first inequality in (4.2) is valid for n5.

The upper bound in (4.3) is obtained by considering the function H(x) defined by

H(x)=lnΓ(x+1)lnΓ ( x + 1 2 ) 1 2 ln ( x + 1 2 ) μ ( x ) 2 ln ( 1 1 4 x + 5 2 ) .

Using Stirling’s formula, we find that

lim x H(x)=0.

Differentiating H(x) and applying the first inequality in (2.2), we obtain

H ( x ) = ψ ( x + 1 ) ψ ( x + 1 2 ) J ( x ) 48 x 3 72 x 2 + 46 x + 5 1 , 024 x 6 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) > L ( x ) J ( x ) 48 x 3 72 x 2 + 46 x + 5 1 , 024 x 6 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) ,

with

J(x)= 8 , 192 x 7 + 10 , 240 x 6 + 2 , 944 x 5 96 x 4 + 48 x 3 + 2 x 2 27 x 2 128 ( 8 x + 3 ) ( 8 x + 5 ) x 5 ( 2 x + 1 ) .

We claim that the function H (x)>0 for x2. It suffices to show that

I(x):= 1 , 024 x 6 ( L ( x ) J ( x ) ) 48 x 3 72 x 2 + 46 x + 5 ln ( 8 x + 3 8 x + 5 ) >0for x2.

Differentiation yields

I (x)= S ( x ) 16 x 9 ( 8 x + 3 ) 2 ( 8 x + 5 ) 2 ( 2 x + 1 ) 2 ( 48 x 3 72 x 2 + 46 x + 5 ) 2 ,

where S(x) is a polynomial of degree 15 with integer coefficients (some positive, some negative). It can be shown further that

S(x)=(x2) P 14 (x)+5,637,072,199,918,

so

S(x)>0

for x2 and so

I (x)<0

for x2, and we have

I(x)> lim x I(x)=0,x2.

This proves the claim.

Hence, H(x) is strictly increasing for x2. Direct computation yields

H(1)=0.000462508,H(2)=0.000005843.

Consequently, the sequence (H(n)) is strictly increasing for n1. This leads to

H(n)< lim n H(n)=0,n1,

which means that the second inequality in (4.2) is valid for n1. The proof of Theorem 4 is complete. □

In fact, it is proved that

W n = π 2 ( 1 1 4 n + 5 2 ) 1 3 64 n 2 + 3 64 n 3 23 1 , 024 n 4 + O ( n 5 ) ,n.
(4.4)

References

  1. Berggren L, Borwein J, Borwein P (Eds): Pi: A Source Book. 2nd edition. Springer, New York; 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Amdeberhan T, Espinosa O, Moll VH, Straub A: Wallis-Ramanujan-Schur-Feynman. Am. Math. Mon. 2010, 117: 618-632.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller SJ: A probabilistic proof of Wallis’s formula for π . Am. Math. Mon. 2008, 115: 740-745.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Wästlund J: An elementary proof of the Wallis product formula for Pi. Am. Math. Mon. 2007, 114: 914-917.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Myerson G: The limiting shape of a sequence of rectangles. Am. Math. Mon. 1992, 99: 279-280. 10.2307/2325077

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sofo A: Some representations of π . Aust. Math. Soc. Gaz. 2004, 31: 184-189.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sofo A: π and some other constants. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2005. Article ID 138 (electronic),6(5): Article ID 138 (electronic)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckmann P: A History of Pi. St. Martin’s Press, New York; 1971.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunham W: Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics. Penguin, Baltimore; 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal RP, Agarwal H, Sen SK: Birth, growth and computation of Pi to ten trillion digits. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013. Article ID 100, 2013: Article ID 100 10.1186/1687-1847-2013-100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buric, T, Elezović, N, Šimić, R: Asymptotic expansions of the multiple quotients of gamma functions with applications. Math. Inequal. Appl. (to appear)

  12. Elezović N, Lin L, Vukšić L: Inequalities and asymptotic expansions for the Wallis sequence and the sum of the Wallis ratio. J. Math. Inequal. 2013, 7: 679-695.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirschhorn MD: Comments on the paper ‘Wallis sequence estimated through the Euler-Maclaurin formula: even from the Wallis product π could be computed fairly accurately’ by Lampret. Aust. Math. Soc. Gaz. 2005, 32: 194.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lampret V: Wallis sequence estimated through the Euler-Maclaurin formula: even from the Wallis product π could be computed fairly accurately. Aust. Math. Soc. Gaz. 2004, 31: 328-339.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lampret V: An asymptotic approximation of Wallis’ sequence. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2012, 10: 775-787. 10.2478/s11533-011-0138-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin L: Further refinements of Gurland’s formula for π . J. Inequal. Appl. 2013. Article ID 48, 2013: Article ID 48 10.1186/1029-242X-2013-48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mortici C: Estimating π from the Wallis sequence. Math. Commun. 2012, 17: 489-495.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mortici C, Cristea VG, Lu D: Completely monotonic functions and inequalities associated to some ratio of gamma function. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014. 10.1016/j.amc.2014.04.085

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mortici C: Completely monotone functions and the Wallis ratio. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 717-722. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mortici C: Sharp inequalities and complete monotonicity for the Wallis ratio. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 2010, 17: 929-936.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mortici C: A new method for establishing and proving new bounds for the Wallis ratio. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 13: 803-815.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mortici C: New approximation formulas for evaluating the ratio of gamma functions. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52: 425-433. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.03.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Păltănea E: On the rate of convergence of Wallis’ sequence. Aust. Math. Soc. Gaz. 2007, 34: 34-38.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (Eds): National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series 55 In Handbook of Mathematical Functions: with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover, New York; 1972. 9th printing 9th printing

  25. Chen, CP: Completely monotonic functions relating to the ratio of gamma functions (submitted)

  26. Luke YL I. In The Special Functions and Their Approximations. Academic Press, New York; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-En Deng.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, L., Deng, JE. & Chen, CP. Inequalities and asymptotic expansions associated with the Wallis sequence. J Inequal Appl 2014, 251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-251

Keywords