Skip to main content

Unitarily invariant norm inequalities involving Heron and Heinz means

Abstract

In this paper, we present some new inequalities for unitarily invariant norms involving Heron and Heinz means for matrices, which generalize the result of TheoremĀ 2.1 (Fu and He in J. Math. Inequal. 7(4):727-737, 2013) and refine the inequality of TheoremĀ 6 (Zhan in SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 20: 466-470, 1998). Our results are a refinement and a generalization of some existing inequalities.

MSC:47A30, 15A60.

1 Introduction

Throughout, let M m , n be the space of mƗn complex matrices and M n = M n , n .

A norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„ is called unitarily invariant norm if āˆ„UAVāˆ„=āˆ„Aāˆ„ for all Aāˆˆ M n and for all unitary matrices U,Vāˆˆ M n . Two classes of unitarily invariant norms are especially important. The first is the class of the Ky Fan k-norm āˆ„ ā‹… āˆ„ ( k ) , defined as

āˆ„ A āˆ„ ( k ) = āˆ‘ j = 1 k s j (A),k=1,ā€¦,n,

where s i (A) (i=1,ā€¦,n) are the singular values of A with s 1 (A)ā‰„ā‹Æā‰„ s n (A), which are the eigenvalues of the positive semidefinite matrix |A|= ( A āˆ— A ) 1 2 , arranged in decreasing order and repeated according to multiplicity. The second is the class of the Schatten p-norm āˆ„ ā‹… āˆ„ ( p ) , defined as

āˆ„ A āˆ„ p = ( āˆ‘ j = 1 n s j p ( A ) ) 1 p = ( tr | A | p ) 1 p ,1ā‰¤p<āˆž.

For two nonnegative real numbers a and b, the Heinz mean and Heron mean in the parameter v, 0ā‰¤vā‰¤1, are defined, respectively, as

H v ( a , b ) = a v b 1 āˆ’ v + a 1 āˆ’ v b v 2 , F Ī± ( a , b ) = ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) a b + Ī± a + b 2 .

Note that H 0 (a,b)= H 1 (a,b)= a + b 2 (the arithmetic mean of a and b) and H 1 2 (a,b)= a b (the geometric mean of a and b). It is easy to see that as a function of v, H v (a,b) is convex, attains its minimum at v= 1 2 , and attains its maximum at v=0 and v=1.

The operator version of the Heinz mean [1] asserts that if A, B and X are operators on a complex separable Hilbert space such that A and B are positive, then for every unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„, the function g(v)=āˆ„ A v X B 1 āˆ’ v + A 1 āˆ’ v X B v āˆ„ is convex on [0,1], attains its minimum at v= 1 2 , and attains its maximum at v=0 and v=1. Moreover, the operator version of the Heron mean [2] asserts that f(Ī±)=āˆ„(1āˆ’Ī±) A 1 2 X B 1 2 +Ī±( A X + X B 2 )āˆ„.

Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , A, B are positive definite, Kaur and Singh [2] have proved the following inequalities for any unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„:

1 2 āˆ„ A v X B 1 āˆ’ v + A 1 āˆ’ v X B v āˆ„ ā‰¤ āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A 1 2 X B 1 2 + Ī± ( A X + X B 2 ) āˆ„
(1.1)

and

āˆ„ A 1 2 X B 1 2 āˆ„ ā‰¤ 1 2 āˆ„ A 2 3 X B 1 3 + A 1 3 X B 2 3 āˆ„ ā‰¤ 1 2 + t āˆ„ A X + t A 1 2 X B 1 2 + X B āˆ„ ,
(1.2)

where 1 4 ā‰¤vā‰¤ 3 4 , Ī±āˆˆ[ 1 2 ,āˆž) and tāˆˆ(āˆ’2,2].

Replacing A, B by A 2 , B 2 in (1.1) and (1.2), then putting u=2v, the following inequalities hold:

1 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„
(1.3)

and

āˆ„AXBāˆ„ā‰¤ 1 2 āˆ„ A 4 3 X B 2 3 + A 2 3 X B 4 3 āˆ„ ā‰¤ 1 t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X + t A X B + X B 2 āˆ„ ,
(1.4)

where 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 , Ī±āˆˆ[ 1 2 ,āˆž) and tāˆˆ(āˆ’2,2].

Zhan proved in [3] that if A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite, then

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X + t A X B + X B 2 āˆ„
(1.5)

for 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 and tāˆˆ(āˆ’2,2].

Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite, for 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 and tāˆˆ(āˆ’2,2]; Fu et al. in [4] proved that

2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 2 ( āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A r X B 2 āˆ’ r + A 2 āˆ’ r X B r āˆ„ d r āˆ’ 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ ) ā‰¤ 2 t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X + t A X B + X B 2 āˆ„ .
(1.6)

Recently, Kaur et al. [5], He et al. [6] and Bakherad et al. [7] have studied similar topics.

For the sake of convenience, we set

g(u)= āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u 2 āˆ„ .

In Section 2, we will generalize and refine some existing inequalities for unitarily invariant norms involving Heron and Heinz means for matrices and present some new refinements of the inequalities above.

2 Main results

In this section, we firstly utilize the convexity of the function g(u) to obtain a unitarily invariant norms inequality that leads to another version of the inequality (1.6), which is also the refinement of the inequality (1.5).

To obtain the results, we need the following lemma on convex functions [8, 9].

Lemma 2.1 Let f be a real valued continuous convex function on an interval [a,b] which contains ( x 1 , x 2 ). Then for x 1 ā‰¤xā‰¤ x 2 , we have

f(x)ā‰¤ f ( x 2 ) āˆ’ f ( x 1 ) x 2 āˆ’ x 1 xāˆ’ x 1 f ( x 2 ) āˆ’ x 2 f ( x 1 ) x 2 āˆ’ x 1 .

Theorem 2.2 Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite. Then for any unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„, 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 and Ī±āˆˆ[ 1 2 ,āˆž),

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ ,
(2.1)

where r 0 =min[ u 2 ,1āˆ’ u 2 ].

Proof For 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤1, by the convexity of the function g(u) and Lemma 2.1, presented above, we have

g(u)ā‰¤ g ( 1 ) āˆ’ g ( 1 2 ) 1 2 uāˆ’ 1 2 g ( 1 ) āˆ’ g ( 1 2 ) ) 1 2 ,

which implies

g(u)ā‰¤2(1āˆ’u)g ( 1 2 ) +(2uāˆ’1)g(1).
(2.2)

By (1.3) and (2.2), we have

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤4(1āˆ’u) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ +2(2uāˆ’1)āˆ„AXBāˆ„.

So,

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .
(2.3)

For 1ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 , by the convexity of the function g(u) and Lemma 2.1, presented above, we have

g(u)ā‰¤ g ( 3 2 ) āˆ’ g ( 1 ) 1 2 uāˆ’ g ( 3 2 ) āˆ’ 3 2 g ( 1 ) 1 2 ,

which implies

g(u)ā‰¤(3āˆ’2u)g(1)+2(uāˆ’1)g ( 3 2 ) .
(2.4)

By (1.3) and (2.4), we have

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 3 āˆ’ 2 u ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( u āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .

So,

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .
(2.5)

By (2.3) and (2.5), for 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 , Ī±āˆˆ[ 1 2 ,āˆž) and r 0 =min[ u 2 ,1āˆ’ u 2 ], we have the following equivalent inequality:

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .

The proof is completed.ā€ƒā–”

Remark 2.3 With a simple computation between the upper bounds in (1.3) and (2.1), obviously we have

āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ āˆ’ ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ āˆ’ 2 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ = ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ āˆ’ ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ = ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) ( āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ āˆ’ āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ ) > 0 .

Thus the inequality (2.1) is a refinement of the inequality (1.3).

Now, we present a refinement of the inequality āˆ„AXBāˆ„ā‰¤āˆ„(1āˆ’Ī±)AXB+Ī±( A 2 X + X B 2 2 )āˆ„.

Theorem 2.4 Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite. Then for any unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„, 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 , and Ī±āˆˆ[ 1 2 ,āˆž), we have

2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 2 ( āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ d u āˆ’ 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ ) ā‰¤ āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ ,
(2.6)

where r 0 =min[ u 2 ,1āˆ’ u 2 ].

Proof For 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤1, from Theorem 2.2, we have

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 4 ( 1 āˆ’ u ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ + 2 ( 2 u āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ .

By integrating both sides of the inequality above, we have

āˆ« 1 2 1 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ d u ā‰¤ 4 āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ āˆ« 1 2 1 ( 1 āˆ’ u ) d u + 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ āˆ« 1 2 1 ( 2 u āˆ’ 1 ) d u = 1 2 āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ + 1 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ .
(2.7)

For 1ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 , from Theorem 2.2, we have

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 3 āˆ’ 2 u ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( u āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .

Similarly, by integrating both sides of the inequality above, we have

āˆ« 1 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ d u ā‰¤ 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ āˆ« 1 3 2 ( 3 āˆ’ 2 u ) d u + 4 āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ āˆ« 1 3 2 ( 2 u āˆ’ 1 ) d u = 1 2 āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ + 1 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ .
(2.8)

It follows from (2.7) and (2.8) that

āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ duā‰¤ āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ +āˆ„AXBāˆ„,

which is equivalent to

2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 2 ( āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ d u āˆ’ 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ ) ā‰¤ 2 āˆ„ ( 1 āˆ’ Ī± ) A X B + Ī± ( A 2 X + X B 2 2 ) āˆ„ .

The proof is completed.ā€ƒā–”

Remark 2.5 Obviously,

āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ duāˆ’2āˆ„AXBāˆ„ā‰„0.

Thus, the inequality (2.6) is a refinement of the inequality āˆ„AXBāˆ„ā‰¤āˆ„(1āˆ’Ī±)AXB+Ī±( A 2 X + X B 2 2 )āˆ„.

Taking Ī±= 2 t + 2 (āˆ’2<tā‰¤2), the following corollaries are obtained.

Corollary 2.6 Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite. Then for any unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„ and 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 ,

āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ ā‰¤ 2 ( 4 r 0 āˆ’ 1 ) āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 4 ( 1 āˆ’ 2 r 0 ) t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X + t A X B + X B 2 āˆ„ ,
(2.9)

where r 0 =min[ u 2 ,1āˆ’ u 2 ] and āˆ’2<tā‰¤2.

Corollary 2.7 Let A,B,Xāˆˆ M n , such that A, B are positive semidefinite. Then for any unitarily invariant norm āˆ„ā‹…āˆ„, 1 2 ā‰¤uā‰¤ 3 2 ,

2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ + 2 ( āˆ« 1 2 3 2 āˆ„ A u X B 2 āˆ’ u + A 2 āˆ’ u X B u āˆ„ d u āˆ’ 2 āˆ„ A X B āˆ„ ) ā‰¤ 2 t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X + t A X B + X B 2 āˆ„ ,
(2.10)

where r 0 =min[ u 2 ,1āˆ’ u 2 ] and āˆ’2<tā‰¤2.

Thus, on the one hand, the inequality (2.9) is a refinement of the inequality āˆ„AXBāˆ„ā‰¤ 1 t + 2 āˆ„ A 2 X+tAXB+X B 2 āˆ„, and also another version of the inequality (1.6); on the other hand, the inequality (2.10) is just the inequality proved in [4], so the inequality (2.6) presented in Theorem 2.4 is also the generalization of the inequality proved in [4].

References

  1. Kittaneh F: On the convexity of the Heinz means. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 2010, 68: 519ā€“527. 10.1007/s00020-010-1807-6

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Kaur R, Singh M: Complete interpolation of matrix versions of Heron and Heinz means. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 16: 93ā€“99.

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Zhan X: Inequalities for unitarily invariant norms. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 1998, 20: 466ā€“470. 10.1137/S0895479898323823

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Fu X, He C: On some inequalities for unitarily invariant norms. J. Math. Inequal. 2013,7(4):727ā€“737.

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Kaur R, Moslehian MS, Singh M, Conde C: Further refinements of the Heinz inequality. Linear Algebra Appl. 2014, 447: 26ā€“37.

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. He CJ, Zou LM, Qaisar S: On improved arithmetric-geometric mean and Heinz inequalities for matrices. J. Math. Inequal. 2012,6(3):453ā€“459.

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Bakherad M, Moslehian MS: Reverses and variations of Heinz inequality. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2014. 10.1080/03081087.2014.880433

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Bhatia R, Sharma R: Some inequalities for positive linear maps. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012, 436: 1562ā€“1571. 10.1016/j.laa.2010.09.038

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Wang S, Zou L, Jiang Y: Some inequalities for unitarily invariant norms of matrices. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 10

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their heartfelt thanks to the referees for their detailed and helpful suggestions for revising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haisong Cao.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. HC is responsible for all the whole of the article appearing.

Authorsā€™ contributions

JW carried out the matrix operator theory studies and participated in the conception and design. HC conceived of the study, participated in its design and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, H., Wu, J. Unitarily invariant norm inequalities involving Heron and Heinz means. J Inequal Appl 2014, 288 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-288

Keywords