- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Operator ideal of Norlund-type sequence spaces
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2015, Article number: 255 (2015)
Abstract
Let E be a Norlund sequence space which is invariant under the doubling operator
Using the approximation numbers \((\alpha_{n}(T))^{\infty}_{n=0}\) of operators from a Banach space X into a Banach space Y, we give the sufficient (not necessary) conditions on E such that the components
form an operator ideal, the finite rank operators are dense in the complete space of operators \(U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y)\) which is a longstanding open problem. Finally we give an answer for Rhoades (Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. Lincei (9) Mat. Appl. 59(3-4):238-241, 1975) about the linearity of E-type spaces \((U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y))\), and we conclude under a few conditions that every compact operator would be approximated by finite rank operators. Our results agree with those in (J. Inequal. Appl., 2013, doi:10.1186/1029-242x-2013-186) for the space \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))\), where \((p_{n})\) is a sequence of positive reals.
1 Introduction
As an aftereffect of the enormous applications in geometry of Banach spaces, spectral hypothesis, hypothesis of eigenvalue dispersions and fixed point hypothesis and so on, the hypothesis of operator ideal goals possesses an uncommon essentialness in useful examination. A large portion of the administrator goals in the family of Banach spaces or normed spaces in straight practical examination are characterized by diverse scalar grouping spaces. All through the paper
And \(\mathbb{N}=\{0, 1, 2,\ldots \}\), by w we denote the space of all real sequences and θ is the zero vector of E. In [1], by using the approximation numbers and p-absolutely summable sequences of real numbers \(\ell^{p}\) (\(0< p<\infty\)), Pietsch formed the operator ideals. In [2], Faried and Bakery considered the space \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))\), where \((p_{n})\) is a sequence of positive reals and \(\ell_{M}\), when \(M(t)=t^{p}\) (\(0< p<\infty\)), which match in special with \(\ell^{p}\). Bakery [3, 4] took some different mean of Cesaro type spaces involving Lacunary sequence \(\operatorname {Ces}(\theta, p)\) defined in [5] to form an operator ideal with its approximation numbers.
2 Definitions and preliminaries
Definition 2.1
An s-function is a map allocating to each operator \(T\in L(X, Y)\) a non-negative scalar sequence \((s_{n}(T))_{n=0}^{\infty}\), and the number \(s_{n}(T)\) is called the nth s-number of T assuming that the following conditions are verified:
-
(a)
\(\Vert T \Vert =s_{0}(T)\geq s_{1}(T)\geq s_{2}(T)\geq\cdots\geq0\) for \(T\in L(X, Y)\);
-
(b)
\(s_{n}(S_{1}+S_{2})\leq s_{n}(S_{1})+ \Vert S_{2} \Vert \) for all \(S_{1}, S_{2}\in L(X, Y)\);
-
(c)
ideal property: \(s_{n}(RVT)\leq \Vert R \Vert s_{n}(V) \Vert T \Vert \) for all \(T\in L(X_{0}, X)\), \(V\in L(X, Y)\) and \(R\in L(Y, Y_{0})\), where \(X_{0}\) and \(Y_{0}\) are arbitrary Banach spaces;
-
(d)
if \(G\in L(X, Y)\) and \(\lambda\in\mathbb{R}\), we obtain \(s_{n}(\lambda G)=\vert \lambda \vert s_{n}(G)\);
-
(e)
rank property: If \(\operatorname {rank}(T)\leq n\), then \(s_{n}(T)=0\) for each \(T\in L(X, Y)\);
-
(f)
norming property: \(s_{r\geq n}(I_{n})=0\) or \(s_{r< n}(I_{n})=1\), where \(I_{n}\) represents the unit operator on the n-dimensional Hilbert space \(\ell_{2}^{n}\).
There a few cases would define s-numbers, we specify close approximation numbers \(\alpha_{n}(S)\), Gelfand numbers \(c_{n}(S)\), Kolmogorov numbers \(d_{n}(S)\) and Tichomirov numbers \(d_{n}^{*}(S)\). The sum of these numbers fulfills the next condition:
-
(g)
Additivity: \(s_{n+m}(T_{1}+T_{2})\leq s_{n}(T_{1})+s_{m}(T_{2})\) for all \(T_{1}, T_{2}\in L(X, Y)\).
Definition 2.2
Let L be the class of all bounded linear operators between any arbitrary Banach spaces. A subclass U of L is called an operator ideal if each element \(U(X, Y)=U\cap L(X, Y)\) fulfills the accompanying conditions:
-
(i)
\(I_{K}\in U\), where K represents a Banach space of one dimension.
-
(ii)
The space \(U(X, Y)\) is a linear space over \(\mathbb{R}\).
-
(iii)
If \(T\in L(X_{0}, X)\), \(V\in U(X, Y)\) and \(R\in L(Y, Y_{0})\), then \(RVT\in U(X_{0}, Y_{0})\). See [6] and [7].
Definition 2.3
An Orlicz function is a function \(M:[0,\infty)\rightarrow[0,\infty)\) which is convex, positive, non-decreasing, continuous with \(M(0)= 0\) and \(\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}M(x)=\infty\).
See [8] and [9]. In the event that convexity of M is supplanted by \(M(x+y)\leq M (x) + M (y)\), it is known as a modulus function, presented by Nakano [10].
Definition 2.4
An Orlicz function M is said to fulfill \(\Delta_{2}\)-condition for all estimations of \(x\geq0\) if there exists a steady \(k>0\) such that \(M(2x)\leq k M(x)\). The \(\Delta_{2}\)-condition is compared to \(M(lx)\leq k l M(x)\) for all estimations of x and for \(l>1\).
Lindentrauss and Tzafriri [11] used the idea of an Orlicz function to define the following sequence spaces:
which is a Banach space with the Luxemburg norm defined by
The space \(\ell_{M}\) is directly related to the space \(\ell^{p}\), which is an Orlicz sequence space with \(M (x) = x^{p}\) for \(1\leq p <\infty \).
For \(\rho(x)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (\frac{ \sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k}\vert x_{k}\vert }{\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k}} )^{p_{n}}\), the Norlund sequence spaces considered by Wang [12] are defined as
where \((p_{n})\) and \((q_{n})\) are sequences of positive reals, \(p_{n}\geq1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). A Norlund sequence space is a Banach space with the Luxemburg norm defined by
If \((p_{n})\) is bounded, we might essentially compose
Remark 2.5
-
(1)
Taking \(q_{n}=1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), then \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is reduced to \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))\) studied by Sanhan and Suantai [13].
-
(2)
Taking \(q_{n}=1\) and \(p_{n}=p\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), then \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is reduced to \(\operatorname {ces}_{p}\) studied by many authors (see [14, 15] and [16]).
In order to give full knowledge to the reader, we add the article [17] on the paranormed Nörlund sequence spaces and the textbook [18] containing five chapters on the sequence spaces.
Definition 2.6
Let E be a linear space of sequences, then E is called a (sss) if:
-
(1)
For \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), \(e_{n}\in E\);
-
(2)
E is solid, i.e., assuming \(x=(x_{n})\in w\), \(y=(y_{n})\in E\) and \(\vert x_{n}\vert \leq \vert y_{n}\vert \) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), then \(x\in E\);
-
(3)
\((x_{[\frac{n}{2}]})_{n=0}^{\infty}\in E\), where \([\frac {n}{2}]\) indicates the integral part of \(\frac{n}{2}\), whenever \((x_{n})_{n=0}^{\infty}\in E\).
Example 2.7
\(\ell^{p}\) is a (sss) if \(p\in(0, \infty)\).
Example 2.8
Let M be an Orlicz function with \(\Delta_{2}\)-condition, then \(\ell _{M}\) is a (sss).
Example 2.9
\(\operatorname {ces}_{p}\) is a (sss) if \(p\in(1, \infty)\).
Example 2.10
Pick an increasing sequence \((p_{n})\) with \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\inf p_{n}>1\) and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sup p_{n}<\infty\), hence \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))\) will be a (sss).
Definition 2.11
A subclass of the (sss) is called a pre-modular (sss) assuming that we have a map \(\rho: E\rightarrow[0,\infty[\) with the following:
-
(i)
For \(x\in E\), \(x=\theta\Leftrightarrow\rho(x)=0\) with \(\rho (x)\geq0\);
-
(ii)
For each \(x\in E\) and scalar λ, we get a real number \(L\geq1\) for which \(\rho(\lambda x)\leq L\vert \lambda \vert \rho( x)\);
-
(iii)
\(\rho(x+y)\leq K(\rho(x)+\rho(y))\) for each \(x, y\in E\) holds for a few numbers \(K\geq1\);
-
(iv)
For \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), \(\vert x_{n}\vert \leq \vert y_{n}\vert \), we obtain \(\rho ((x_{n}))\leq\rho((y_{n}))\);
-
(v)
The inequality \(\rho((x_{n}))\leq\rho((x_{[\frac {n}{2}]}))\leq K_{0}\rho((x_{n}))\) holds for some numbers \(K_{0}\geq1\);
-
(vi)
\(\overline{F}=E_{\rho}\), where F is the space of any finite sequences;
-
(vii)
There is steady \(\xi>0\) such that \(\rho(\lambda, 0, 0, 0,\ldots)\geq\xi \vert \lambda \vert \rho(1, 0, 0, 0,\ldots)\) for any \(\lambda\in\mathbb{R}\).
Condition (ii) is equivalent to \(\rho(x)\) is continuous at θ. The pre-modular ρ characterizes a metric topology in E, and the linear space E enriched with this topology will be indicated further by \(E_{\rho}\). Moreover, the condition (i) of Definition 2.6 and the condition (vi) of Definition 2.11 explain that \((e_{n})_{n\in\mathbb {N}}\) is a Schauder basis of \(E_{\rho}\).
Example 2.12
\(\ell^{p}\) is a pre-modular (sss) if \(p\in(0, \infty)\).
Example 2.13
Suppose that M is an Orlicz function with \(\Delta_{2}\)-condition, hence \(\ell_{M}\) is a pre-modular (sss).
Example 2.14
\(\operatorname {ces}_{p}\) is a pre-modular (sss) if \(p\in(1, \infty)\).
Example 2.15
\(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))\) is a pre-modular (sss) if \((p_{n})\) is an increasing sequence, \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\inf p_{n}>1\) and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup p_{n}<\infty\).
Definition 2.16
Theorem 2.17
If E is a (sss), then \(U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}\) is an operator ideal.
Now and in what follows, \((p_{n})\) and \((q_{n})\) are assumed to be bounded sequences of positive reals. We define \(e_{n}=\{0, 0,\ldots,1,0,0,\ldots\}\), where 1 appears at the nth place for all \(n\in \mathbb{N}\), and the given inequality will be used in the sequel: \(\vert a_{n}+b_{n}\vert ^{p_{n}}\leq H(\vert a_{n}\vert ^{p_{n}}+\vert b_{n}\vert ^{p_{n}})\), where \(H=\max\{1, 2^{h-1}\}\), \(h=\sup_{n}p_{n}\) and \(p_{n}\geq1\) for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). See [19].
3 Main results
3.1 Linear problem
We study here the operator ideals generated by the approximation numbers and Norlund sequence spaces such that the class of all bounded linear operators between any arbitrary Banach spaces with nth approximation numbers of the bounded linear operators in these sequence spaces form an operator ideal.
Theorem 3.1
\(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is a (sss) if the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(b1)
The sequence \((p_{n})\) is increasing;
-
(b2)
The sequence \((q_{n})\) with \(\sum^{\infty }_{n=0} (\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k} )^{-p_{n}}<\infty\);
-
(b3)
\((q_{n})\) is either monotone decreasing or monotone increasing, and there exists a constant \(C\geq1\) such that \(q_{2n+1}\leq C q_{n}\).
Proof
(1-i) Suppose \(x, y\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\). Since
\(x+y\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\).
(1-ii) Let \(x\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) and \(\lambda\in\mathbb{R}\). Since \((p_{n})\) is bounded, then we have
that is, \(\lambda x\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\). Hence, by (1-i) and (1-ii), \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is a linear space. Let us show that \(\{ e_{m}\}_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\subseteq \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\). Since \((p_{n})\) is bounded and \(\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k} )^{-p_{n}}<\infty\), we get
Hence \(e_{m}\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) for all \(m\in\mathbb{N}\).
(2) Let \(y\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) and \(\vert x_{n}\vert \leq \vert y_{n}\vert \) for every \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). Since \(q_{n}>0\) for every \(n\in\mathbb{N}\),
we get \(x\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\).
(3) Let \((x_{n})\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\), \((p_{n})\) be an increasing sequence and \((q_{n})\) be increasing with a constant \(C\geq 1\) such that \(q_{2n+1}\leq Cq_{n}\). Then we have
then \((x_{[\frac{n}{2}]})\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\). □
By Theorem 2.17, we derive the following corollaries.
Corollary 3.2
\(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}\) is an ideal operator if conditions (b1), (b2) and (b3) are satisfied.
Corollary 3.3
\(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}\) is an ideal operator if \((p_{n})\) is increasing, \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\inf p_{n}>1\) and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup p_{n}<\infty\).
Corollary 3.4
If \(1< p<\infty\), then \(U_{\operatorname {ces}_{p}}^{\mathrm {app}}\) is an operator ideal.
3.2 Topological problem
For a Norlund sequence space E, the ideal of the finite rang operators in the class of Banach spaces is dense in \(U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y)\), which gives a negative answer to Rhoades [20] open problem about the linearity of E-type spaces \((U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y))\).
Theorem 3.5
\(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}=\overline{F(X, Y)}\), assuming conditions (b1), (b2) and (b3) are fulfilled, and the converse is not true, in general.
Proof
Firstly, we substantiate that each finite operator \(T\in F(X, Y)\) belongs to \(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y)\). Since \(e_{m}\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) for each \(m\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is a linear space, for each finite operator \(T\in F(X, Y)\), i.e., we obtain that \((\alpha_{n}(T))_{n=0}^{\infty}\) holds main finitely a significant unique number in relation to zero. Currently we substantiate that \(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}\subseteq\overline{F(X, Y)}\). Let \((q_{n})\) be a monotonic increasing sequence such that there exists a constant \(C\geq1\) for which \(q_{2n+1}\leq C q_{n}\), then we have for \(n\geq s\) that
By taking \(T\in U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}(X, Y)\), we obtain \((\alpha_{n}(T))_{n=0}^{\infty}\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\), and while \(\rho((\alpha_{n}(T))_{n=0}^{\infty})<\infty\), let \(\varepsilon\in(0, 1)\), at that point there exists \(s\in\mathbb{N}-\{0\}\) such-and-such \(\rho((\alpha_{n}(T))_{n=s}^{\infty})<\frac{\varepsilon}{2^{h+2}\delta C}\), where \(\delta=\max \{1, \sum_{n=s}^{\infty }(\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k})^{-p_{n}} \}\). As \(\alpha_{n}(T)\) is decreasing for all \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), we obtain
Hence, there exists \(A\in F_{2s}(X, Y)\) such that \(\operatorname {rank}A\leq2s\) and
since the sequence \((p_{n})\) is bounded, then on considering
and from the definition of approximation numbers, there exists \(N\in \mathbb{N}-\{0\}\), \(A_{N}\) with \(\operatorname {rank}(A_{N})\leq N\) and \(\Vert T-A \Vert \leq 2\alpha_{n}(T)\). Since \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\alpha _{n}(T)=0\), then \(\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty} \Vert T-A_{N}\Vert =0\), hence we put
Since \((p_{n})\) is increasing and \((\frac{1}{\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k}} )\) is decreasing for each \(n\in\mathbb{N}\), we have by using (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) that
Since \(I_{3}\in U^{\mathrm {app}}_{\operatorname {ces}((1), (1))}\) but condition (b2) is not satisfied, which gives a counter example for the converse part. This completes the proof. From Theorem 3.5, we can say that if (b1), (b2) and (b3) are satisfied, then every compact operator would be approximated by finite rank operators and the converse does not hold, in general. □
Corollary 3.6
\(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}=\overline{F(X, Y)}\) if \((p_{n})\) is increasing,
Corollary 3.7
\(U_{\operatorname {ces}_{p}}^{\mathrm {app}}=\overline{F(X, Y)}\), where \(1< p<\infty\).
3.3 Completeness of the ideal components
For a Norlund sequence space E, the components of ideal \(U_{E}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\) are complete.
Theorem 3.8
\(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) is a pre-modular (sss) if conditions (b1), (b2) and (b3) are satisfied.
Proof
We define a functional ρ on \(\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) as \(\rho (x)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (\frac{\sum^{n}_{k=0}q_{k}\vert x_{k}\vert }{\sum_{k=0}^{n}q_{k}} )^{p_{n}}\).
(i) Evidently, \(\rho(x)\geq0\) and \(\rho(x)=0\Leftrightarrow x=\theta\).
(ii) There exists steady \(L=\max \{1,\sup_{n}\vert \lambda \vert ^{p_{n}} \} \geq1\) such that \(\rho(\lambda x)\leq L\lambda\rho( x)\) for all \(x\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\) and for each real λ.
(iii) For some numbers \(K=\max\{1, 2^{h-1}\}\geq1\), we have the inequality \(\rho(x+y)\leq K(\rho(x)+\rho(y))\) for all \(x, y\in \operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\).
(iv) Clearly, (2) of Theorem 3.1 holds.
(v) It is obtained from (3) of Theorem 3.1 that \(K_{0}\geq (2^{2h-1}+2^{h-1}+2^{h})\geq1\).
(vi) It is clear that \(\overline{F}=\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))\).
(vii) There exists a steady \(0<\xi\leq \vert \lambda \vert ^{p_{0}-1}\) such that \(\rho(\lambda, 0, 0, 0,\ldots)\geq\xi \vert \lambda \vert \rho(1, 0, 0, 0,\ldots)\) for all \(\lambda\in\mathbb{R}\). □
Theorem 3.9
\(U_{E_{\rho}}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\) is complete if X and Y are Banach spaces and \(E_{\rho}\) is a pre-modular (sss).
Proof
Let \((T_{m})\) be a Cauchy sequence in \(U_{E_{\rho}}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\). Then, by utilizing part (vii) of Definition 2.11 and since \(L(X, Y)\supseteq U_{E_{\rho}}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\), we get
then \((T_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\) is plus a Cauchy sequence in \(L(X, Y)\). While the space \(L(X, Y)\) is a Banach space, so there exists \(T\in L(X, Y)\) such that \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty} \Vert T_{m}-T \Vert =0\) and while \((\alpha_{n}(T_{m}))_{n=0}^{\infty}\in E\) for each \(m\in\mathbb{N}\). Therefore, using parts (iii) and (iv) of Definition 2.11 and ρ is continuous at θ, we obtain
we have \((\alpha_{n}(T))_{n=0}^{\infty}\in E\), then \(T\in U_{E_{\rho }}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\). □
Corollary 3.10
On the off chance that X and Y are Banach spaces and conditions (b1), (b2) and (b3) are fulfilled, then \(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}), (q_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\) is complete.
Corollary 3.11
If X and Y are Banach spaces and \((p_{n})\) is an increasing sequence, \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\inf p_{n}>1\) and \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup p_{n}<\infty\), then \(U_{\operatorname {ces}((p_{n}))}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\) is complete.
Corollary 3.12
If X and Y are Banach spaces and \(1< p<\infty\), then \(U_{\operatorname {ces}_{p}}^{\mathrm {app}}(X,Y)\) is complete.
References
Pietsch, A: Operator Ideals. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1980)
Faried, N, Bakery, AA: Mappings of type Orlicz and generalized Cesáro sequence space. J. Inequal. Appl. (2013). doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-186
Bakery, AA: Mappings of type generalized de La Vallée Poussin’s mean. J. Inequal. Appl. (2013). doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-518
Bakery, AA: Operator ideal of Cesaro type sequence spaces involving lacunary sequence. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 419560 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/419560
Lim, KP: Matrix transformation on certain sequence spaces. Tamkang J. Math. 8(2), 213-220 (1977)
Kalton, NJ: Spaces of compact operators. Math. Ann. 208, 267-278 (1974)
Lima, Å, Oja, E: Ideals of finite rank operators, intersection properties of balls, and the approximation property. Stud. Math. 133, 175-186 (1999)
Krasnoselskii, MA, Rutickii, YB: Convex Functions and Orlicz Spaces. Gorningen, Netherlands (1961)
Orlicz, W: Über Raume (\(L^{M}\)) Bull. Int. Acad Polon. Sci. A, 93-107 (1936)
Nakano, H: Concave modulars. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 5, 29-49 (1953)
Lindenstrauss, J, Tzafriri, L: On Orlicz sequence spaces. Isr. J. Math. 10, 379-390 (1971)
Wang, CS: On Norlund sequence spaces. Tamkang J. Math. 9(2), 269-274 (1978)
Sanhan, W, Suantai, S: On k-nearly uniformly convex property in generalized Cesàro sequence space. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 57, 3599-3607 (2003)
Lee, PY: Cesáro sequence spaces. Math. Chron. 13, 29-45 (1984)
Lui, YQ, Wu, BE, Lee, PY: Method of Sequence Spaces. Guangdong of Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou (1996) (in Chinese)
Shiue, JS: On the Cesàro sequence spaces. Tamkang J. Math. 1(1), 19-25 (1970)
Yeşilkayagil, M, Başar, F: On the paranormed Nörlund sequence space of non-absolute type. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 858704 (2014)
Başar, F: Summability Theory and Its Applications. Bentham Science Publishers, Istanbul (2012)
Altay, B, Başar, F: Generalization of the sequence space \(\ell(p)\) derived by weighted means. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 330(1), 147-185 (2007)
Rhoades, BE: Operators of \(A-p\) type. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. Lincei (9) Mat. Appl. 59(3-4), 238-241 (1975)
Acknowledgements
The author wants to thank the reviewers for much encouragement, support, productive feedback, cautious perusal and making a helpful remark, which improved the presentation and comprehensibility of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Bakery, A.A. Operator ideal of Norlund-type sequence spaces. J Inequal Appl 2015, 255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0774-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0774-5