<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1029-242X-2008-870950</ui>
   <ji>1029-242X</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research Article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>On Logarithmic Convexity for Ky-Fan Inequality</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Anwar</snm><fnm>Matloob</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>matloob_t@yahoo.com</email></au>
            <au id="A2"><snm>Pe&#269;ari&#263;</snm><fnm>J</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>pecaric@mahazu.hazu.hr</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Abdus Salam School of Mathematical Sciences, GC University, Lahore 54660, Pakistan</p></ins>
            <ins id="I2"><p>Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Journal of Inequalities and Applications</source>
         <issn>1029-242X</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>2008</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>870950</fpage>
         <url>http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2008/1/870950</url>
         <xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1155/2008/870950</pubid></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><rec><date><day>19</day><month>11</month><year>2007</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>14</day><month>2</month><year>2008</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>5</day><month>3</month><year>2008</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2008</year><collab>The Author(s).</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p/>
            </st>
            <p>We give an improvement and a reversion of the well-known Ky-Fan inequality as well as some related results.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>1. Introduction and Preliminaries</p>
         </st>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i1.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i2.gif"/></inline-formula> be real numbers such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i3.gif"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i4.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i5.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i6.gif"/></inline-formula> be the weighted geometric mean and arithmetic mean, respectively, defined by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i7.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i8.gif"/></inline-formula>. In particular, consider the above-mentioned means <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i9.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i10.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then the well-known Ky-Fan inequality is </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M11">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i11.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>It is well known that Ky-Fan inequality can be obtained from the Levinson inequality [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>], see also [<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>, page 71].</p>
         <p>Theorem 1.1. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i12.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real-valued 3-convex function on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i13.gif"/></inline-formula>, then for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i14.gif"/></inline-formula></p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M12">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i15.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>In [<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>], the second author proved the following result.</p>
         <p>Theorem 1.2. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i16.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real-valued 3-convex function on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i17.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i18.gif"/></inline-formula> points on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i19.gif"/></inline-formula>, then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M13">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i20.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>In this paper, we will give an improvement and reversion of Ky-Fan inequality as well as some related results.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>2. Main Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Lemma 2.1. </p>
         <p>Define the function </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M21">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i21.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i22.gif"/></inline-formula> that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i23.gif"/></inline-formula> is 3-convex for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i24.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Theorem 2.2. </p>
         <p>Define the function </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M22">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i25.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i26.gif"/></inline-formula> as in (1.2). Then</p>
         <p/>
         <p indent="1">(1)for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i27.gif"/></inline-formula>, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M23">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i28.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i29.gif"/></inline-formula> is log convex in the Jensen sense;</p>
         <p indent="1">(2)<inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i30.gif"/></inline-formula> is continuous on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i31.gif"/></inline-formula>, it is also log convex, that is, for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i32.gif"/></inline-formula>, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M24">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i33.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>with </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M25">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i34.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i35.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i36.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>(1) Let us consider the function </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M26">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i37.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i38.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i39.gif"/></inline-formula> are reals. </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M27">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i40.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i41.gif"/></inline-formula>. This implies that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i42.gif"/></inline-formula> is 3-convex. Therefore, by (1.2), we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i43.gif"/></inline-formula>, that is, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M28">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i44.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>This follows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i45.gif"/></inline-formula> is log convex in the Jensen sense.</p>
         <p>(2) Note that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i46.gif"/></inline-formula> is continuous at all points <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i47.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i48.gif"/></inline-formula> since </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M29">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i49.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i50.gif"/></inline-formula> is a continuous and convex in Jensen sense, it is log convex. That is, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M210">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i51.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which completes the proof.</p>
         <p>Corollary 2.3. </p>
         <p>For <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i52.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i53.gif"/></inline-formula> as in (1.2), </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M211">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i54.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Setting <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i55.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i56.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 1.2, we get <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i57.gif"/></inline-formula> or </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M212">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i58.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Again setting <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i59.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i60.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 1.2, we get <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i61.gif"/></inline-formula> or </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M213">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i62.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Combining both inequalities (2.12), (2.13), we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M214">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i63.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Also we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i64.gif"/></inline-formula> positive for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i65.gif"/></inline-formula>; therefore, we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M215">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i66.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Applying exponentional function, we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M216">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i67.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Remark 2.4. </p>
         <p>In Corollary 2.3, putting <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i68.gif"/></inline-formula> we get an improvement of Ky-Fan inequality.</p>
         <p>Theorem 2.5. </p>
         <p>Define the function </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M217">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i69.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i70.gif"/></inline-formula> as for Theorem 1.1. Then</p>
         <p/>
         <p indent="1">(1)for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i71.gif"/></inline-formula>, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M218">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i72.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i73.gif"/></inline-formula> is log convex in the Jensen sense;</p>
         <p indent="1">(2)<inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i74.gif"/></inline-formula> is continuous on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i75.gif"/></inline-formula>, it is also log convex. That is for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i76.gif"/></inline-formula>, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M219">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i77.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>with </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M220">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i78.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i79.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2008-870950-i80.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2.</p>
         <p>Remark 2.6. </p>
         <p>Let us note that similar results for difference of power means were recently obtained by Simic in [<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>].</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Generalization of an inequality of Ky-Fan</p></title><aug><au><snm>Levinson</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1964</pubdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0022-247X(64)90089-7</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><aug><au><snm>Pe&#269;ari&#263;</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Proschan</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Tong</snm><fnm>YL</fnm></au></aug><source>Convex Functions, Partial Orderings, and Statistical Applications, Mathematics in Science and Engineering</source><publisher>Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA</publisher><pubdate>1992</pubdate><volume>187</volume><fpage>xiv+467</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>An inequality for 3-convex functions</p></title><aug><au><snm>Pe&#269;ari&#263;</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1982</pubdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>213</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0022-247X(82)90055-5</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>On logarithmic convexity for differences of power means</p></title><aug><au><snm>Simic</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Inequalities and Applications</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>2007</volume><lpage>8</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>