<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1029-242X-2010-201486</ui>
   <ji>1029-242X</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research Article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>On Some Matrix Trace Inequalities</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au ca="yes" id="A1"><snm>Uluk&#246;k</snm><fnm>Z&#252;beyde</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>zulukok@selcuk.edu.tr</email></au>
            <au id="A2"><snm>T&#252;rkmen</snm><fnm>Ramazan</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>rturkmen@selcuk.edu.tr</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Department of Mathematics, Science Faculty, Sel&#231;uk University, 42003 Konya, Turkey</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Journal of Inequalities and Applications</source>
         <issn>1029-242X</issn>
         <pubdate>2010</pubdate>
         <volume>2010</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>201486</fpage>
         <url>http://www.journalofinequalitiesandapplications.com/content/2010/1/201486</url>
         <xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1155/2010/201486</pubid></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><rec><date><day>23</day><month>12</month><year>2009</year></date></rec><revrec><date><day>4</day><month>3</month><year>2010</year></date></revrec><acc><date><day>14</day><month>3</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>6</day><month>4</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>The Author(s).</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p/>
            </st>
            <p>We first present an inequality for the Frobenius norm of the Hadamard product of two any square matrices and positive semidefinite matrices. Then, we obtain a trace inequality for products of two positive semidefinite block matrices by using <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i1.gif"/></inline-formula> block matrices.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>1. Introduction and Preliminaries</p>
         </st>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i2.gif"/></inline-formula> denote the space of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i3.gif"/></inline-formula> complex matrices and write <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i4.gif"/></inline-formula>. The identity matrix in <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i5.gif"/></inline-formula> is denoted <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i6.gif"/></inline-formula>. As usual, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i7.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the conjugate transpose of matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i8.gif"/></inline-formula>. A matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i9.gif"/></inline-formula> is Hermitian if <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i10.gif"/></inline-formula>. A Hermitian matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i11.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be positive semidefinite or nonnegative definite, written as <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i12.gif"/></inline-formula>, if</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M11">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i13.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i14.gif"/></inline-formula> is further called positive definite, symbolized <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i15.gif"/></inline-formula>, if the strict inequality in (1.1) holds for all nonzero <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i16.gif"/></inline-formula>. An equivalent condition for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i17.gif"/></inline-formula> to be positive definite is that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i18.gif"/></inline-formula> is Hermitian and all eigenvalues of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i19.gif"/></inline-formula> are positive real numbers. Given a positive semidefinite matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i20.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i21.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i22.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the unique positive semidefinite <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i23.gif"/></inline-formula> power of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i24.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i25.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i26.gif"/></inline-formula> be two Hermitian matrices of the same size. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i27.gif"/></inline-formula> is positive semidefinite, we write</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M12">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i28.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Denote <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i29.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i30.gif"/></inline-formula> eigenvalues and singular values of matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i31.gif"/></inline-formula>, respectively. Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i32.gif"/></inline-formula> is Hermitian matrix, its eigenvalues are arranged in decreasing order, that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i33.gif"/></inline-formula> and if <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i34.gif"/></inline-formula> is any matrix, its singular values are arranged in decreasing order, that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i35.gif"/></inline-formula> The trace of a square matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i36.gif"/></inline-formula> (the sum of its main diagonal entries, or, equivalently, the sum of its eigenvalues) is denoted by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i37.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i38.gif"/></inline-formula> be any <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i39.gif"/></inline-formula> matrix. The Frobenius (Euclidean) norm of matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i40.gif"/></inline-formula> is</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M13">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i41.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>It is also equal to the square root of the matrix trace of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i42.gif"/></inline-formula> that is, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M14">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i43.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>A norm <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i44.gif"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i45.gif"/></inline-formula> is called unitarily invariant <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i46.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i47.gif"/></inline-formula> and all unitary <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i48.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Given two real vectors <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i49.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i50.gif"/></inline-formula> in decreasing order, we say that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i51.gif"/></inline-formula> is weakly log majorized by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i52.gif"/></inline-formula>, denoted <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i53.gif"/></inline-formula>, if <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i54.gif"/></inline-formula>, and we say that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i55.gif"/></inline-formula> is weakly majorized by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i56.gif"/></inline-formula>, denoted <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i57.gif"/></inline-formula>, if <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i58.gif"/></inline-formula>. We say <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i59.gif"/></inline-formula> is majorized by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i60.gif"/></inline-formula> denoted by <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i61.gif"/></inline-formula>, if</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M15">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i62.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>As is well known, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i63.gif"/></inline-formula> yields <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i64.gif"/></inline-formula> (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>, pages 17&#8211;19]).</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i65.gif"/></inline-formula> be a square complex matrix partitioned as</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M16">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i66.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i67.gif"/></inline-formula> is a square submatrix of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i68.gif"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i69.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonsingular, we call</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M17">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i70.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>the Schur complement of <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i71.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i72.gif"/></inline-formula> (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>, page 175]). If <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i73.gif"/></inline-formula> is a positive definite matrix, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i74.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonsingular and</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M18">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i75.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Recently, Yang [<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>] proved two matrix trace inequalities for positive semidefinite matrices <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i76.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i77.gif"/></inline-formula>,</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M19">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i78.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i79.gif"/></inline-formula></p>
         <p>Also, authors in [<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>] proved the matrix trace inequality for positive semidefinite matrices <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i80.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i81.gif"/></inline-formula>,</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M110">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i82.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i83.gif"/></inline-formula> is a positive integer.</p>
         <p>Furthermore, one of the results given in [<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>] is</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M111">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i84.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i85.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i86.gif"/></inline-formula> positive definite matrices, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i87.gif"/></inline-formula> is any positive integer.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>2. Lemmas</p>
         </st>
         <p>Lemma 2.1 (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>For any <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i88.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i89.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i90.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.2 (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i91.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i92.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i93.gif"/></inline-formula> then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M21">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i94.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Lemma 2.3 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i95.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i96.gif"/></inline-formula> be real numbers. Then, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M22">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i97.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Lemma 2.4 (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>, page 269]). </p>
         <p>If <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i98.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i99.gif"/></inline-formula> are poitive semidefinite matrices, then, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M23">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i100.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Lemma 2.5 (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>, page 177]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i101.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i102.gif"/></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i103.gif"/></inline-formula> matrices. Then, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M24">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i104.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Lemma 2.6 (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i105.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i106.gif"/></inline-formula> are positive semidefinite matrices. Then, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M25">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i107.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i108.gif"/></inline-formula> is a positive integer.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>3. Main Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Horn and Mathias [<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>] show that for any unitarily invariant norm <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i109.gif"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i110.gif"/></inline-formula></p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M31">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i111.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Also, the authors in [<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>] show that for positive semidefinite matrix <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i112.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i113.gif"/></inline-formula></p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M32">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i114.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i115.gif"/></inline-formula> and all unitarily invariant norms <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i116.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>By the following theorem, we present an inequality for Frobenius norm of the power of Hadamard product of two matrices.</p>
         <p>Theorem 3.1. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i117.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i118.gif"/></inline-formula> be <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i119.gif"/></inline-formula>-square complex matrices. Then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M33">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i120.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i121.gif"/></inline-formula> is a positive integer. In particular, if <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i122.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i123.gif"/></inline-formula> are positive semidefinite matrices, then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M34">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i124.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>From definition of Frobenius norm, we write </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M35">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i125.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Also, for any <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i126.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i127.gif"/></inline-formula>, it follows that (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>]) </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M36">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i128.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M37">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i129.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i130.gif"/></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i131.gif"/></inline-formula> and from inequality (3.7), we write </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M38">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i132.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>From Lemma 2.1 and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we write </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M39">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i133.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By combining inequalities (3.7), (3.8), and (3.9), we arrive at </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M310">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i134.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Thus, the proof is completed. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i135.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i136.gif"/></inline-formula> be positive semidefinite matrices. Then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M311">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i137.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i138.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Theorem 3.2. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i139.gif"/></inline-formula> be positive semidefinite matrices. For positive real numbers <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i140.gif"/></inline-formula></p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M312">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i141.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Let </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M313">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i142.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>We know that <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i143.gif"/></inline-formula>, then by using the definition of Frobenius norm, we write </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M314">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i144.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Thus, by using Theorem 3.1, the desired is obtained.</p>
         <p>Now, we give a trace inequality for positive semidefinite block matrices.</p>
         <p>Theorem 3.3. </p>
         <p>Let </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M315">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i145.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>then, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M316">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i146.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i147.gif"/></inline-formula> is an integer.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Let </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M317">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i148.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>with <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i149.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i150.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i151.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i152.gif"/></inline-formula> (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>]). Let </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M318">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i153.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>with <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i154.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i155.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i156.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i157.gif"/></inline-formula> (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>]). We know that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M3">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i158.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By using Lemma 2.2, it follows that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M320">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i159.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Therefore, we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M321">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i160.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>As result, we write </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M322">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i161.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Example 3.4. </p>
         <p>Let </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M323">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i162.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i163.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i164.gif"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i165.gif"/></inline-formula> From inequality (1.11), for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i166.gif"/></inline-formula> we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M324">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i167.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Also, for <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i168.gif"/></inline-formula>, since <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i169.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i170.gif"/></inline-formula>, we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M325">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i171.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Thus, according to this example from (3.24) and (3.25), we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M326">
               <graphic file="1029-242X-2010-201486-i172.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgment</p>
            </st>
            <p>This study was supported by the Coordinatorship of Sel&#231;uk University's Scientific Research Projects (BAP).</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><aug><au><snm>Zhan</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><source>Matrix Inequalities, Lecture Notes in Mathematics</source><publisher>Springer, Berlin, Germany</publisher><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>1790</volume><fpage>viii+116</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B2"><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Matrix Theory: Basic Results and Techniques, Universitext</source><publisher>Springer, New York, NY, USA</publisher><pubdate>1999</pubdate><fpage>xiv+277</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>A matrix trace inequality</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>250</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>372</fpage><lpage>374</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jmaa.2000.7068</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>A matrix trace inequality</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>XM</fnm></au><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>XQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Teo</snm><fnm>KL</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>263</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>327</fpage><lpage>331</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jmaa.2001.7613</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Matrix and operator inequalities</p></title><aug><au><snm>Dannan</snm><fnm>FM</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3, article 34</issue><lpage>7</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Another proof of a singular value inequality concerning Hadamard products of matrices</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>FZ</fnm></au></aug><source>Linear and Multilinear Algebra</source><pubdate>1988</pubdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>311</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/03081088808817843</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>A note on the trace inequality for products of Hermitian matrix power</p></title><aug><au><snm>Yang</snm><fnm>ZP</fnm></au><au><snm>Feng</snm><fnm>XX</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5, article 78</issue><lpage>12</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B8"><aug><au><snm>Lieb</snm><fnm>EH</fnm></au><au><snm>Thirring</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Studies in Mathematical Physics, Essays in Honor of Valentine Bartmann</source><publisher>Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA</publisher><pubdate>1976</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B9"><aug><au><snm>Horn</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Johnson</snm><fnm>CR</fnm></au></aug><source>Topics in Matrix Analysis</source><publisher>Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK</publisher><pubdate>1991</pubdate><fpage>viii+607</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Some eigenvalue inequalities for positive semidefinite matrix power products</p></title><aug><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>BY</fnm></au><au><snm>Gong</snm><fnm>MP</fnm></au></aug><source>Linear Algebra and Its Applications</source><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>184</volume><fpage>249</fpage><lpage>260</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>An analog of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for Hadamard products and unitarily invariant norms</p></title><aug><au><snm>Horn</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Mathias</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>481</fpage><lpage>498</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1137/0611034</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities associated with positive semidefinite matrices</p></title><aug><au><snm>Horn</snm><fnm>RA</fnm></au><au><snm>Mathias</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Linear Algebra and Its Applications</source><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>142</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0024-3795(90)90256-C</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Schur complements and matrix inequalities in the L&#246;wner ordering</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Linear Algebra and Its Applications</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>321</volume><issue>1&#8211;3</issue><fpage>399</fpage><lpage>410</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Inequalities on singular values of block triangular matrices</p></title><aug><au><snm>Li</snm><fnm>C-K</fnm></au><au><snm>Mathias</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>131</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1137/S0895479801398517</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>